Fitbit Alta HR vs. Fitbit Charge

 
Alta HR
Charge
 FitbitAlta HRBuy NowFitbitChargeBuy Now

Basic Info

Suggested Price$150$130
Release20172014

Activity & Fitness

Calories
Cycling (Bicycling)
Distance
Heart
Oxygen
Sleep
Steps
Swim

Battery

Duration7 days7-10 days
Rechargeable

Compatibility

Android
iOS
Windows PhoneNA
Mac
Windows

Connectivity

Bluetooth
Cellular
GPS
NFC
Wi-Fi

Display

Color
Resolution128 x 36NA
Size1.4 inchesNA
TouchNA
TypeOLEDOLED

Functions

Audio Speaker
Clock
Phone
Vibration
Voice

Hardware

Accelerometer
Barometer or Altimeter
Ultraviolet Sensor
Water Resistance1 ATM

Notifications

Phone
Emails
Texts

Software

Operating SystemNA
Apps
Music

Comparing Charge and Alta HR

The Fitbit Alta HR and Fitbit Charge are both popular fitness trackers, each designed to help you monitor your daily activities, sleep patterns, and overall health. The right fitness tracker can be a critical tool for achieving your fitness goals, making it important to understand the differences between these two options. Fitbit has a strong reputation for creating high-quality, user-friendly devices that appeal to a wide audience.

Choosing the right wearable device is essential when trying to maintain a healthy lifestyle. Fitbit, as one of the leading brands in the wearables industry, constantly seeks ways to improve and expand upon its product line. With an extensive history that includes groundbreaking devices and innovative technology, Fitbit is renowned for its commitment to user experience and technology.

Throughout this article, we will provide a comprehensive comparison of the Fitbit Alta HR and Fitbit Charge, covering aspects such as design, features, performance, and value. Let’s dive in!

Design and Build

Fitbit Alta HR

The Fitbit Alta HR features a slim, lightweight design with a durable stainless steel body and an OLED tap display. The tracker measures 1.4 inches in size and has a screen resolution of 128 x 36. The interchangeable bands are available in various materials and colors, including classic rubber, leather, and metal.

Fitbit Charge

Fitbit Charge, on the other hand, is slightly bulkier and has a traditional watch-style clasp for added security. It features a textured band made from elastomer and a stainless steel buckle. The Charge’s OLED display offers a clear view of your stats, but specific screen dimensions and resolution are not available. Similar to the Alta HR, the bands are interchangeable and available in multiple colors.

Comparison of design and build quality

Comparing the two devices, the Alta HR is slimmer and more stylish, making it suitable for daily wear, while the Charge is more rugged and sporty. Both devices are replaced with water resistance up to 1 ATM, but neither offers full waterproofing for swimming activities. The build quality of both devices is reliable and durable, with easily swappable bands allowing for customization.

Features and Functionality

Fitbit Alta HR

Running on a proprietary operating system, the Fitbit Alta HR offers various features such as sleep tracking, heart rate monitoring, and calories burned. Additional functionalities include step counting, distance tracking, and cycling tracking. The device has a battery life of up to 7 days and is compatible with Android, iOS, Windows, and Mac devices. It connects via Bluetooth but lacks GPS, Wi-Fi, NFC, and cellular capabilities.

Fitbit Charge

The Fitbit Charge also utilizes Fitbit’s proprietary OS, boasting a similar set of features including sleep tracking, steps and distance tracking, calories burned, and barometer. However, it lacks heart rate monitoring and cycling tracking. The battery life is between 7 to 10 days, and it’s compatible with Android, iOS, and Windows devices but not with Windows phones. Like the Alta HR, it connects via Bluetooth, but it also lacks GPS, Wi-Fi, NFC, and cellular capabilities.

Comparison of features and performance

Comparing the Fitbit Alta HR and Charge, there are notable differences in features. The Alta HR includes heart rate monitoring and cycling tracking, whereas the Charge does not. However, the Charge includes a barometer for elevation tracking. Both devices have a similar battery life, and both are compatible with most smartphones and computers. Finally, neither device offers GPS, Wi-Fi, or NFC capabilities.

User Interface and User Experience

Fitbit Alta HR

The Alta HR’s OLED display offers easy navigation through the device’s functions with a simple tap. Apps and customization options are limited, but smartphone compatibility allows for notifications such as calls, texts, and emails. Android, iOS, and Windows devices are supported, including Macs and PCs.

Fitbit Charge

With its OLED display, navigation on the Fitbit Charge is straightforward, but it lacks app support and customization options. While it can receive call notifications, it cannot display texts or emails. It is compatible with Android, iOS, and Windows devices, including Macs and PCs.

Comparison of user interface and user experience

The interfaces and user experiences of both the Alta HR and Charge are quite similar, with easy navigation and limited app support. However, the Alta HR has an edge in terms of additional notification features, such as text messages and emails. Compatibility across multiple devices is a benefit for both gadgets.

Price and Value

Fitbit Alta HR

With a price tag of $150, the Fitbit Alta HR may seem more expensive than its sibling. However, considering the additional features like heart rate monitoring and cycling tracking, the Alta HR provides good value for the additional investment.

Fitbit Charge

For a lower price of $130, the Fitbit Charge offers a range of familiar features but lacks some of the advanced functionalities found in the Alta HR. The value proposition lies mainly in its affordability and essential tracking functions, making it suitable for fitness enthusiasts on a budget.

Comparison of price and value

Although the Fitbit Alta HR is more expensive than the Charge, its additional features and notifications make it a more versatile and comprehensive fitness tracker. Those who prioritize heart rate monitoring and cycling tracking may find the extra cost worth it, whereas the Charge remains a solid option for those looking for a more budget-friendly fitness solution.

Conclusion

In comparing the Fitbit Alta HR and Fitbit Charge, it is clear that the Alta HR provides a more comprehensive set of features and a sleeker design. Although the price is higher, the added functionality may be worth it for individuals looking for a more advanced fitness tracker. On the other hand, the Fitbit Charge remains a capable and affordable choice for those seeking essential fitness functions without breaking the bank.

Frequently Asked Questions

Do the Fitbit Alta HR and Charge have built-in GPS?

Neither the Fitbit Alta HR nor the Charge have built-in GPS functionality.

Can I wear the Fitbit Alta HR and Charge while swimming?

Neither of these devices is waterproof, so they should not be worn while swimming or engaging in water-based activities.

What operating systems are compatible with the Fitbit Alta HR and Charge?

Both the Alta HR and Charge can be used with Android, iOS, Windows, and Mac devices. The Charge is not compatible with Windows Phones.

Do the Fitbit Alta HR and Charge support music playback?

Neither device offers music playback functionality. They are focused primarily on fitness tracking.

Are the bands on the Fitbit Alta HR and Charge interchangeable?

Yes, both the Alta HR and Charge offer interchangeable bands, allowing you to customize your device according to your preferences.

All Wearables