Fitbit Zip vs. Fitbit Alta HR

 
Zip
Alta HR
 FitbitZipBuy NowFitbitAlta HRBuy Now

Basic Info

Suggested Price$60$150
Release20122017

Activity & Fitness

Calories
Cycling (Bicycling)
Distance
Heart
Oxygen
Sleep
Steps
Swim

Battery

Duration6 months7 days
Rechargeable

Compatibility

Android
iOS
Windows Phonen/a
Mac
Windows

Connectivity

Bluetooth
Cellular
GPS
NFC
Wi-Fi

Display

Color
Resolutionn/a128 x 36
Sizen/a1.4 inches
Touch
Typen/aOLED

Functions

Audio Speaker
Clock
Phone
Vibration
Voice

Hardware

Accelerometer
Barometer or Altimeter
Ultraviolet Sensor
Water ResistanceSplash Resistant

Notifications

Phone
Emails
Texts

Software

Operating Systemn/a
Apps
Music

Comparing Alta HR and Zip

Welcome to CompareWatch’s detailed comparison between the Fitbit Alta HR and Fitbit Zip. These two fitness trackers, released by Fitbit in 2017 and 2012 respectively, offer different features and functionalities to help you achieve your fitness goals. Choosing the right wearable device is crucial, as it not only helps track your progress but also keeps you motivated to stay on track. Understanding the brands, their reputations, and history is important when deciding which product to choose.

Fitbit, a well-known brand since its establishment in 2007, has been a pioneer in wearable fitness trackers. Throughout the years, Fitbit has maintained its reputation as a reliable and user-friendly product line, catering to various types of consumers. This article delves into the specifics of the Alta HR and Zip, comparing their design, features, user interface, and value for money to help you make an informed decision.

Design and Build

Fitbit Alta HR

The Fitbit Alta HR is designed with a slim, sleek profile, using a combination of materials like stainless steel, elastomer, and an OLED display. Weighing only 30 grams, it measures 1.61 x 0.61 inches, making it compact and comfortable to wear. The screen has a resolution of 128 x 36 pixels, ensuring clarity and readability of fitness data.

Fitbit Zip

The Fitbit Zip is a simpler and more affordable option compared to the Alta HR. It’s compact, lightweight, and made from thermoplastic materials. The device has a small, monochrome screen that displays basic fitness information. Unlike the Alta HR, it doesn’t have a touchscreen; instead, it uses a tap mechanism for navigation.

Comparison of design and build quality

While both devices have different designs, they cater to different preferences and uses. The Alta HR’s slim profile and OLED display make it more attractive and offer better visibility, whereas the Zip’s basic design appeals to a simpler, more budget-conscious consumer. In terms of build quality, both devices are durable and reliable, but the materials used in the Alta HR give it a more premium feel.

Features and Functionality

Fitbit Alta HR

The Fitbit Alta HR boasts several features, although it does not have a dedicated operating system. It is equipped with an accelerometer for tracking various activities and outputs data to an accompanying smartphone app. It has a 7-day battery life and is rechargeable, ensuring convenience for users. Although lack of GPS, cellular, and NFC may limit some functionalities, the device still offers significant value for fitness enthusiasts, with features like heart rate tracking and sleep monitoring.

Fitbit Zip

The Fitbit Zip is a more basic fitness tracker, offering only essential features such as step counting, distance tracking, and calorie tracking. It has no heart rate, cycling, or sleep tracking capabilities. Its battery life extends up to 6 months but requires battery replacement. Compatibility wise, it supports Android, iOS, Mac, and Windows devices - however, it’s missing Windows Phone compatibility.

Comparison of features and performance

When comparing the devices, the Alta HR provides more comprehensive tracking features, particularly in heart rate and sleep monitoring. While the Zip is more affordable and offers a longer battery life, the lack of features might not make it as attractive to fitness enthusiasts. Both devices are compatible with a wide range of systems, making them accessible to many users.

User Interface and User Experience

Fitbit Alta HR

The Alta HR offers a user-friendly interface with its OLED touchscreen display. Navigation is easy and intuitive, while the device also pairs with a smartphone app for additional data analysis and customization. Compatibility is impressive, as it connects with Android, iOS, and Windows Phone devices.

Fitbit Zip

Fitbit Zip’s interface is simple and straightforward, with a tap mechanism used to navigate through basic fitness data on the monochrome screen. It is compatible with Android, iOS, Mac, and Windows devices - allowing for seamless integration of fitness data.

Comparison of user interface and user experience

The Alta HR offers better user experience with its touchscreen display and wider range of customization options. On the other hand, the Zip’s simplicity is suitable for users looking for a basic fitness tracker, without the need for more advanced features or data analytics. Both devices provide adequate user interface and experience, depending on individual preferences.

Price and Value

Fitbit Alta HR

Priced at $150, the Fitbit Alta HR offers a good balance between features and value for money. Although more expensive than the Zip, the comprehensive tracking capabilities, design quality, and longer battery life justify the investment.

Fitbit Zip

The Fitbit Zip’s $60 price tag makes it an affordable option for those looking for a basic fitness tracker. Its simplicity might not be suitable for everyone, but for those on a tight budget or seeking essential features, the Zip offers decent value for money.

Comparison of price and value

When comparing the two devices, the Alta HR offers a better balance of features and value for money, given its additional functionalities, advanced tracking capabilities, and superior design quality. However, the Fitbit Zip is a more affordable option, suitable for users seeking basic functionality and an introductory experience with fitness trackers.

Conclusion

Based on the detailed comparison of the Fitbit Alta HR and Fitbit Zip, the Alta HR stands out as the superior option, providing more advanced tracking features, better design quality, and a more enjoyable user experience. While the Zip may appeal to budget-conscious consumers, the Alta HR offers better value for money overall.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which device is more suitable for fitness enthusiasts?

The Fitbit Alta HR caters better to fitness enthusiasts due to its additional tracking capabilities and extended battery life. It’s also more visually appealing and offers better customization options.

Do both devices have GPS functionality?

No, neither the Fitbit Alta HR nor the Fitbit Zip offers GPS functionality.

Are both devices water-resistant?

The Fitbit Alta HR is not water-resistant, while the Fitbit Zip is splash-resistant, which means it can handle occasional splashes but should not be submerged in water.

What is the main difference between the Fitbit Alta HR and the Fitbit Zip?

The main difference between the two devices is their feature set and overall design quality. The Fitbit Alta HR provides more advanced tracking features, a better design, and a longer battery life than the simpler, more budget-friendly Fitbit Zip.

What’s the battery life of each device?

The Fitbit Alta HR has a battery life of up to 7 days, while the Fitbit Zip’s battery life extends up to 6 months. However, the Zip’s battery requires replacement after its lifespan, whereas the Alta HR’s battery is rechargeable.

All Wearables