Garmin Vivoactive 3 vs. Skagen Falster

 
Vivoactive 3
Falster
 GarminVivoactive 3Buy NowSkagenFalsterBuy Now

Basic Info

Suggested Price$299$275
Release20172018

Activity & Fitness

Calories
Cycling (Bicycling)
Distance
Heart
Oxygen
Sleep
Steps
Swim

Battery

Duration7 days24 hours
Rechargeable

Compatibility

Android
iOS
Windows Phone
Mac
Windows

Connectivity

Bluetooth
Cellular
GPS
NFC
Wi-Fi

Display

Color
Resolution240 x 240
Size1.2 inches
Touch
TypeMIPOLED

Functions

Audio Speaker
Clock
Phone
Vibration
Voice

Hardware

Accelerometer
Barometer or Altimeter
Ultraviolet Sensor
Water Resistance5 ATM1 ATM

Notifications

Phone
Emails
Texts

Software

Operating SystemNA
Apps
Music

Comparing Falster and Vivoactive 3

The Garmin Vivoactive 3 and Skagen Falster are two well-known smartwatches with unique features and benefits. These devices are developed by reputable companies, Garmin and Skagen, which are known for their innovative technology and excellent designs. Choosing the right watch is important as it should cater to the user’s specific needs and preferences.

Garmin has a strong brand reputation for producing high-quality GPS and fitness devices. Established in 1989, the company has years of experience in creating top-notch wearables that cater to various activities and lifestyles. Skagen, on the other hand, started in 1989, is a Danish watch brand known for its minimalistic and timeless designs. Their high-quality timepieces and smartwatches merge fashion and technology seamlessly.

In this article, we will compare and contrast the Garmin Vivoactive 3 and Skagen Falster to provide a comprehensive analysis of these devices. We will discuss design, features, user interface, price, value, and FAQs to help you make an informed decision.

Design and Build

Garmin Vivoactive 3

The Garmin Vivoactive 3 is built with a stainless steel case and strap, ensuring durability and a stylish appearance. Its dimensions are 43.4mm x 43.4mm x 11.7mm with a weight of 43 grams. The Vivoactive 3 has a round, 1.2-inch touchscreen display with a resolution of 240 x 240 pixels, using MIP (Memory-In-Pixel) technology for easy visibility even in bright sunlight.

Skagen Falster

The Skagen Falster boasts a sleek unisex design with a stainless steel case and a leather or mesh strap. Its dimensions and weight vary based on strap selection. The Falster features a round OLED touchscreen display, providing sharp colors and high contrast ratio for better clarity. The exact screen dimensions and resolution for the Skagen Falster are not available.

Comparison of design and build quality

The similarities between the Garmin Vivoactive 3 and Skagen Falster include their stainless steel cases and round touchscreen displays. The differences, however, lie in their build quality, strap materials, and screen technology. The Garmin Vivoactive 3 has a more robust build suited for sporty individuals, while the Skagen Falster offers a minimalist design for those seeking a fashionable watch. The MIP display of Vivoactive 3 provides better visibility in varying light conditions, whereas the OLED display of Falster offers a sharper and more vibrant image.

Features and Functionality

Garmin Vivoactive 3

The Garmin Vivoactive 3 operates on Garmin’s proprietary software and comes with GPS, Bluetooth connectivity, fitness tracking features, and a battery life of up to 7 days. Some key features include heart rate tracking, sleep tracking, swimming tracking, and smartphone compatibility with both iOS and Android devices.

Skagen Falster

The Skagen Falster runs on the Wear OS platform and offers features such as Bluetooth connectivity, fitness tracking capabilities, and a 24-hour battery life. The Falster is also compatible with both iOS and Android smartphones. It tracks distance, calories, and steps, but does not offer heart rate or swimming tracking.

Comparison of features and performance

The Garmin Vivoactive 3 and Skagen Falster share similar features, such as Bluetooth connectivity, fitness tracking, and smartphone compatibility. The differences lie in their respective battery life, operating systems, and additional tracking functionalities. The Vivoactive 3 has a better battery life and offers more extensive fitness tracking options, particularly for swimmers and those focused on heart rate. In contrast, the Skagen Falster has a more limited battery life and may be better suited for those seeking a stylish smartwatch with basic fitness tracking capabilities.

User Interface and User Experience

Garmin Vivoactive 3

The Vivoactive 3 offers easy navigability with its touchscreen display and side-button control, as well as a range of customizable watch faces and widgets. The watch is compatible with both Android and iOS devices, enabling users to receive phone notifications, emails, and texts.

Skagen Falster

The Skagen Falster provides a smooth user experience with its Wear OS platform, offering various customizable watch faces and apps through the Google Play Store. Like the Vivoactive 3, the Falster is compatible with Android and iOS smartphones for notifications and communication functions.

Comparison of user interface and user experience

Both the Garmin Vivoactive 3 and Skagen Falster offer customizable watch faces, smartphone compatibility, and easy touchscreen navigation. The key difference lies in their operating systems, with the Vivoactive 3 using Garmin’s software, while the Falster utilizes Wear OS. This distinction affects app availability and user interface, as Wear OS offers a larger app selection and integration with Google services.

Price and Value

Garmin Vivoactive 3

The Garmin Vivoactive 3 is priced at $299, offering value for money with its extensive fitness tracking features, compatibility, and solid build quality.

Skagen Falster

At $275, the Skagen Falster provides a fashionable design and basic fitness tracking capabilities, making it a suitable choice for individuals seeking a stylish smartwatch with essential features.

Comparison of price and value

Both smartwatches offer competitive prices and unique features. The Garmin Vivoactive 3 delivers better value for fitness enthusiasts with its broader range of tracking options and longer battery life. On the other hand, the Skagen Falster is a suitable choice for style-conscious individuals looking for an attractive design, essential fitness tracking features, and a seamless user experience.

Conclusion

In summary, the Garmin Vivoactive 3 and Skagen Falster cater to different user preferences, providing various features, designs, and functionalities. The Vivoactive 3 is a better choice for those seeking a robust device with extensive fitness tracking capabilities and excellent battery life. In contrast, the Skagen Falster is a perfect choice for those who prioritize style and a minimalistic design coupled with basic fitness tracking options.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the battery life of the Garmin Vivoactive 3 and Skagen Falster?

The Garmin Vivoactive 3 has a battery life of up to 7 days, while the Skagen Falster’s battery life lasts up to 24 hours.

Are both watches compatible with iOS and Android smartphones?

Yes, both watches are compatible with iOS and Android smartphones, allowing users to receive notifications and access communication functions.

Which smartwatch is better suited for fitness tracking?

The Garmin Vivoactive 3 offers a more extensive range of fitness tracking features, including heart rate and swimming tracking, making it more suitable for fitness enthusiasts.

Are the Garmin Vivoactive 3 and Skagen Falster water-resistant?

Yes, the Garmin Vivoactive 3 has a water resistance rating of 5 ATM, while the Skagen Falster has a rating of 1 ATM.

What operating systems do the Garmin Vivoactive 3 and Skagen Falster use?

The Garmin Vivoactive 3 runs on Garmin’s proprietary software, while the Skagen Falster is powered by the Wear OS platform.

All Wearables