Comparing Vivosport and Vivoactive HR
Garmin Vivoactive HR and Garmin Vivosport are two popular wearable devices competing for the attention of fitness enthusiasts. Both devices offer impressive features to help users track their fitness goals, monitor their health, and stay connected on the go.
Choosing the right watch is essential as it can greatly affect your daily routine, workouts, and overall health management. In this comparison, we will explore the specifics of each device, their similarities, and differences, to help you make an informed decision on which one suits your needs best.
Garmin, the brand behind these devices, has a solid reputation for high-quality GPS devices and fitness wearable. Established in 1989, Garmin has excelled in delivering innovations and advancements in wearable technology, allowing users to benefit from their expertise in this field.
In this article, we will cover various aspects of the two devices, including design and build, features and functionality, user interface and experience, price and value, and frequently asked questions to offer a comprehensive comparison.
Design and Build
Garmin Vivoactive HR
The Garmin Vivoactive HR features a sleek design with a 1.38-inch screen size and 148 x 205 screen resolution. This device has a color display with touch capabilities, allowing for easy navigation. The materials used for the watch include:
- High-quality plastic casing
- Silicone strap
- Weight: 47.6 grams
Garmin Vivosport
Unlike its counterpart, the Garmin Vivosport does not disclose its screen size, but it has a 72 x 144 screen resolution, color display, and touch capability. For the Vivosport, the materials include:
- High-quality plastic casing
- Silicone strap
Comparison of design and build quality
Both devices share similarities with their plastic casings and silicone straps. However, there are some key differences, such as the Vivoactive HR offering a larger screen size with higher resolution. The Vivosport, on the other hand, offers a more compact design, although its screen size is undisclosed. Overall, the choice between the two would depend on personal preference, with the Vivoactive HR boasting a larger display and the Vivosport, a more compact design.
Features and Functionality
Garmin Vivoactive HR
The Vivoactive HR offers a rich set of features that cater to various activities and aspects of daily life. Some of its features include:
- Operating system: Proprietary
- Sensors: GPS, accelerometer, barometer/altimeter, heart rate monitor
- Battery life: 13 hours to 8 days
- Fitness tracking: steps, calories, heart rate, sleep, cycling, swimming, distance
- Compatibility: Android, iOS, and Windows devices
Garmin Vivosport
The Vivosport, being a more recent release, also offers a variety of features, and some improvements over the Vivoactive HR:
- Operating system: Proprietary
- Sensors: GPS, accelerometer, barometer/altimeter, heart rate monitor, oxygen tracking
- Battery life: 7 days
- Fitness tracking: steps, calories, heart rate, sleep, cycling, swimming, distance, oxygen
- Compatibility: Android and iOS devices
Comparison of features and performance
The Vivoactive HR and Vivosport have many similarities in terms of features and performance, with both offering various fitness tracking options, sensors, compatibility, and long-lasting battery life. However, the Vivosport stands out with its oxygen tracking feature, which is absent in the Vivoactive HR.
In terms of device compatibility, the Vivoactive HR offers support for a wider range of devices, including Windows phones and computers. In contrast, the Vivosport only supports Android and iOS devices. Ultimately, the choice between these devices would be based on individual needs and compatibility requirements.
User Interface and User Experience
Garmin Vivoactive HR
The user interface and experience of the Vivoactive HR feature a color touch display, customizable watch faces, and easy-to-use navigation. It is also compatible with smartphones through the Garmin Connect Mobile app, which allows users to sync their activities, receive smartphone notifications, and access third-party apps for enhanced versatility.
Garmin Vivosport
Similarly, the Vivosport offers a user-friendly touch display, customizable watch faces, navigation, and compatibility with smartphones through the Garmin Connect Mobile app. However, the Vivosport does not offer support for third-party apps, unlike the Vivoactive HR.
Comparison of user interface and user experience
Both devices provide easy navigation, customization, and smartphone compatibility. The main difference between the two lies in the availability of third-party apps, with the Vivoactive HR offering more flexibility and versatility in this aspect. Despite this, the overall user experience for both devices is intuitive and user-friendly.
Price and Value
Garmin Vivoactive HR
With a price tag of $250, the Garmin Vivoactive HR offers a decent balance between features, design, and performance. With advanced fitness tracking capabilities and compatibility, this device can be a valuable investment for those seeking a comprehensive fitness tracker.
Garmin Vivosport
At $199, the Garmin Vivosport offers a more affordable option without sacrificing much in terms of features and performance. The addition of oxygen tracking and a more compact design make it an appealing choice for those seeking a budget-friendly fitness tracker.
Comparison of price and value
While both devices offer a good balance of features, design, and performance, the Vivosport edges out its competitor in terms of value with a lower price tag and additional features. However, for users who prioritize compatibility and third-party app support, the Vivoactive HR could be the better option.
Conclusion
In comparing the Garmin Vivoactive HR and Garmin Vivosport, each device offers a unique set of benefits based on individual preferences and priorities. The Vivoactive HR stands out with its larger display, compatibility options, and third-party app support, while the Vivosport impresses with its oxygen tracking feature, compact design, and lower price point. Taking these factors into consideration can help users make an informed decision based on their needs, goals, and budget.
Remember that personal preferences ultimately influence the choice of the best wearable device. Whichever device users choose, Garmin’s expertise and commitment to delivering high-quality products ensure a reliable and satisfying experience.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the main difference between Garmin Vivoactive HR and Garmin Vivosport?
The main differences include screen size, device compatibility, third-party app support, and oxygen tracking. The Vivoactive HR has a larger screen, supports Windows devices, and allows third-party apps, while the Vivosport features oxygen tracking and a more compact design.
Are both devices waterproof?
Yes, both the Vivoactive HR and Vivosport are water-resistant up to 5 ATM, making them suitable for swimming and water-based activities.
Do both devices support GPS?
Yes, both the Vivoactive HR and Vivosport are equipped with GPS functionality, allowing them to track and record outdoor activities accurately.
Which device has a better battery life?
The Garmin Vivoactive HR offers a longer battery life, ranging from 13 hours to 8 days depending on usage, compared to the Vivosport’s 7-day battery life.
Can both devices receive notifications from smartphones?
Both devices can receive smartphone notifications such as calls, messages, and emails when connected to a compatible device through the Garmin Connect Mobile app.
