Comparing Bip and M400
The Amazfit Bip and Polar M400 are two popular smartwatches designed for fitness enthusiasts, with both devices offering unique features and performance capabilities. Choosing the right smartwatch can significantly enhance your workout experience and help you track various fitness activities with greater ease.
Amazfit and Polar are reputable brands in the wearable technology industry. Amazfit, a brand under the Huami Corporation, is well-known for designing high-quality smartwatches at an affordable price range. Polar, on the other hand, has been a pioneer in sports technology since 1977 and offers a wide range of heart rate monitors, fitness trackers, and smartwatches.
In this article, we will delve into the design, functionality, user interface, and pricing of the Amazfit Bip and Polar M400 smartwatches, providing you with detailed insights and comparisons to help you make an informed decision.
Design and Build
Amazfit Bip
The Amazfit Bip boasts a simple yet sleek design, featuring a lightweight polycarbonate casing and a hypoallergenic silicone strap. Its 1.28-inch color LCD touchscreen display has a resolution of 176 x 176 pixels.
Key design specifications of Amazfit Bip:
- Polycarbonate casing
- 1.28-inch color LCD touchscreen display
- Hypoallergenic silicone strap
Polar M400
With a durable design, the Polar M400 comes with a stainless-steel bezel and a soft silicone strap. Its monochrome LCD display lacks touch capabilities and relies on buttons for navigation.
Key design specifications of Polar M400:
- Stainless-steel bezel
- Non-touch monochrome LCD display
- Silicone strap
Comparison of design and build quality
The Amazfit Bip stands out for its lightweight design and touchscreen display, whereas the Polar M400 boasts a durable build with a stainless-steel bezel. The Bip’s hypoallergenic silicone strap might be more comfortable for users with sensitive skin in comparison to the M400's standard silicone strap. In terms of display, the Amazfit Bip offers richer visuals with its color LCD screen, while the Polar M400 has a monochrome display with no touch capabilities.
Features and Functionality
Amazfit Bip
The Amazfit Bip comes with several useful features designed for fitness enthusiasts, including heart rate tracking, sleep tracking, and built-in GPS. The device provides an impressive 30-day battery life under normal usage and is compatible with both Android and iOS devices.
Key features of Amazfit Bip:
- Operating system: Proprietary OS
- Built-in GPS and GLONASS
- IP68 water resistance
- 30-day battery life
- Android and iOS compatibility
Polar M400
As a fitness-focused smartwatch, the Polar M400 includes an array of features such as distance tracking, calories tracking, sleep tracking, and GPS. The device’s battery life ranges between 8 hours and 30 days depending on the usage pattern, and it offers compatibility with both Android and iOS.
Key features of Polar M400:
- Operating system: Proprietary OS
- GPS
- 3 ATM water resistance
- 8-hour to 30-day battery life
- Android, iOS, Mac, and Windows compatibility
Comparison of features and performance
Both devices offer similar features, including GPS, sleep tracking, and steps tracking. However, the Amazfit Bip provides heart rate monitoring and a longer battery life, making it ideal for users who require continuous heart rate tracking and more extended periods between charges. Despite lacking heart rate monitoring, the Polar M400 features a slightly better water resistance rating at 3 ATM.
User Interface and User Experience
Amazfit Bip
The Amazfit Bip offers a user-friendly experience with its touchscreen display, intuitive navigation, and customizable watch faces. The device also supports smartphone notifications (texts, emails, and phone calls) and is compatible with Android and iOS smartphones.
Polar M400
The Polar M400 relies on buttons for navigation, providing a more traditional user experience. Its display is functional yet minimalistic, and the device supports smartphone notifications and compatibility with Android, iOS, Mac, and Windows platforms.
Comparison of user interface and user experience
The key difference between the two devices lies in their navigation and display features. The Amazfit Bip features a touchscreen color display, making it more visually appealing and user-friendly. Meanwhile, the Polar M400's monochrome display and button navigation provide a simpler, more traditional user experience.
Price and Value
Amazfit Bip
At $99.99, the Amazfit Bip offers an affordable and cost-effective option for those seeking a feature-rich smartwatch without breaking the bank.
Polar M400
Priced at $200, the Polar M400 caters to users looking for a durable and fitness-focused smartwatch from a well-established brand in the sports technology industry.
Comparison of price and value
While both devices cater to fitness enthusiasts, the Amazfit Bip provides greater value for money with its lower price point and additional features such as heart rate monitoring and a color touchscreen display. On the other hand, the Polar M400 offers a higher water resistance rating and compatibility with Mac and Windows platforms, justifying its higher price.
Conclusion
In conclusion, both the Amazfit Bip and Polar M400 are capable and well-designed smartwatches catering to fitness enthusiasts. The Bip stands out for its lightweight design, color touchscreen, heart rate monitoring, and cost-effectiveness, while the M400 appeals to those seeking higher water resistance and a durable build. Ultimately, the decision comes down to individual preferences and requirements.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which device has a better battery life, Amazfit Bip or Polar M400?
The Amazfit Bip boasts a longer battery life of up to 30 days under normal usage, as compared to the Polar M400's 8-hour to 30-day battery life, depending on usage.
Does the Amazfit Bip have heart rate monitoring?
Yes, the Amazfit Bip features heart rate monitoring, whereas the Polar M400 does not include this functionality.
Which smartwatch has better water resistance, Amazfit Bip or Polar M400?
The Polar M400 has a better water resistance rating at 3 ATM, while the Amazfit Bip features an IP68 rating.
Is the Amazfit Bip compatible with Mac and Windows computers?
No, the Amazfit Bip only supports compatibility with Android and iOS smartphones. In contrast, the Polar M400 offers compatibility with Android, iOS, Mac, and Windows platforms.
Which device features a touchscreen display, Amazfit Bip or Polar M400?
The Amazfit Bip sports a 1.28-inch color touchscreen display, while the Polar M400 features a non-touch monochrome LCD screen.
