Comparing VivoActive 4 and GTS
In this article, we will provide an in-depth comparison of the Amazfit GTS and Garmin VivoActive 4 smartwatches. These two devices have gained popularity in the world of wearable fitness trackersand smartwatches. Choosing the right fitness tracker or smartwatch is crucial, as your choice will significantly impact your fitness journey and daily life.
Both Amazfit and Garmin have established themselves as reputable brands in the smartwatch industry. Amazfit, a product line under Huami Corporation, is known for affordable yet feature-packedwearables. In contrast, Garmin is a household name in the world of GPS technology and has created an extensive lineup of fitness trackers and wearable devices over the years.
This article aims to provide a thorough comparison between the Amazfit GTS and Garmin VivoActive 4, delving into their design, features, user experience, and value. By offering a comprehensiveanalysis, we hope to make the decision-making process easier for those looking to purchase the ideal fitness tracker or smartwatch.
Design and Build
Amazfit GTS
The Amazfit GTS features a lightweight aluminum alloy body and a robust 1.65-inch AMOLED color display with a resolution of 348 x 442 pixels. This combination of materials and technology offers acomfortable and durable wearing experience. The GTS has 5 ATM water resistance, allowing for use during swimming and protection from rain.
Garmin VivoActive 4
The Garmin VivoActive 4 comes with a sturdy build and a 1.3-inch sunlight-visible MIP display, making it easy to read outdoors. It has a resolution of 260 x 260 pixels providing sharp visuals.Similar to the GTS, the VivoActive 4 also has a water resistance rating of 5 ATM.
Comparison of design and build quality
Both the Amazfit GTS and the Garmin VivoActive 4 offer quality builds with their respective designs. The GTS’s AMOLED display and sleek design give it a more modern appearance, whereas theVivoActive 4 has a more rugged and sporty look. Prospective buyers will need to consider their personal preferences and priorities to determine the best fit for their needs.
Features and Functionality
Amazfit GTS
The Amazfit GTS operates on Wear OS and is compatible with both Android and iOS devices. It offers a comprehensive range of fitness tracking features, including calories, cycling, distance, heartrate, sleep, steps, and swimming. Additionally, it has a battery life of up to 14 days, GPS, Bluetooth, and Wi-Fi connectivity. However, the GTS does not support oxygen level tracking or NFCfunctionality.
Garmin VivoActive 4
Like the GTS, the Garmin VivoActive 4 also operates on Wear OS and is compatible with Android and iOS smartphones. It offers similar fitness tracking features as the GTS, plus oxygen leveltracking. The VivoActive 4 has a battery life of up to 8 days and supports GPS, Bluetooth, and Wi-Fi connectivity. However, it also lacks NFC functionality.
Comparison of features and performance
When comparing features and performance, the Amazfit GTS and Garmin VivoActive 4 are quite similar. The primary differences include the GTS’s longer battery life and the VivoActive 4's oxygenlevel tracking. Users will need to evaluate which of these features is more essential to their needs and preferences.
User Interface and User Experience
Amazfit GTS
The Amazfit GTS’s display offers a touch interface with customizable watch faces, making it both usable and visually appealing. It supports phone functions, emails, and texts, along withdownloadable apps through Wear OS. However, it lacks audio or voice functionality.
Garmin VivoActive 4
The Garmin VivoActive 4 also features a touch interface, customizable watch faces, and supports phone functions, emails, and texts. It additionally offers downloadable apps, music functionality,and vibration alerts. Like the GTS, the VivoActive 4 does not have audio or voice functions.
Comparison of user interface and user experience
Both devices offer excellent user interfaces and user experiences, with intuitive navigation and robust features for users to engage with. Individual preferences in display quality may influencethe decision, but overall, the Amazfit GTS and Garmin VivoActive 4 are comparable in this area.
Price and Value
Amazfit GTS
Priced at $150, the Amazfit GTS offers an affordable option for those interested in a versatile and feature-rich smartwatch. Its long battery life and sleek design provide excellent value for itsprice point.
Garmin VivoActive 4
At a higher price of $349, the Garmin VivoActive 4 provides a more premium option with additional features such as oxygen level tracking. However, this higher cost may be a significant factor forthose with a limited budget.
Comparison of price and value
When looking at price and value, the Amazfit GTS stands out as the more budget-friendly option, while still providing a range of great features. However, the Garmin VivoActive 4 offers additionalfunctionality at a higher price point, which might be more appealing to users who prioritize specific features or brand reputation.
Conclusion
In conclusion, both the Amazfit GTS and Garmin VivoActive 4 are excellent smartwatches with a plethora of features to suit various needs and preferences. The GTS provides a budget-friendly optionwith a sleek appearance and generous battery life, whereas the VivoActive 4 offers more advanced functionality at a higher price. Ultimately, the best choice will depend on the individual’spriorities, budget, and style preferences.
