Comparing GTS and A370
The Amazfit GTS and Polar A370 are two popular smartwatches from well-established brands. Each device offers a unique set of features and design elements that cater to the preferences of different users. In this comprehensive comparison, we will delve into the specifics of each watch, exploring their design, build quality, features, and functionality as well as their user interface and user experience, and discuss which option provides better value for money.
Wearable technology, including smartwatches and fitness trackers, has become increasingly popular as users seek convenient ways to monitor their health, fitness, and daily activities. Choosing the right device can be an essential aspect to ensure that these wearables are helpful and effective in achieving one’s fitness and productivity goals.
Amazfit, a part of the Chinese tech company Huami, has gained a reputation for manufacturing quality wearables at affordable prices. On the other hand, Polar is a Finnish manufacturer with a long history of creating heart rate monitors and sports technology products.
Let’s take a closer look at these two devices to determine what sets them apart and help you make an informed decision when choosing between the Amazfit GTS and Polar A370.
Design and Build
Amazfit GTS
The Amazfit GTS is designed with a sleek and stylish look, featuring an aluminum alloy body, mineral glass display, and a silicone strap. The watch weighs 24.8 grams and has a 1.65-inch AMOLED screen with a resolution of 348 x 442 pixels. This provides vibrant colors and sharp visuals, ensuring a pleasant user experience.
Polar A370
The Polar A370, with its durable construction and sophisticated design, features a stainless steel case, mineral glass display, and a soft silicone strap. The watch weighs 31 grams and has a 1.18-inch TFT LCD screen with a 160 x 80-pixel resolution.
Comparison of design and build quality
Both devices have their advantages, with Amazfit GTS boasting a larger and higher resolution screen and a lighter weight, while the Polar A370 has the added durability of a stainless steel case. Overall, the choice between the two will come down to personal preference and the importance of display quality versus durability.
Features and Functionality
Amazfit GTS
The Amazfit GTS runs on Wear OS, offering multiple useful features, including activity tracking, heart rate monitoring, sleep tracking, swim tracking, and GPS functionality. The watch has a 14-day battery life, making it convenient for long-term use without frequent charging. Additionally, the device is compatible with both Android and iOS smartphones but does not support Windows or macOS devices.
Polar A370
The Polar A370 offers similar features, such as activity tracking, heart rate monitoring, sleep tracking, and GPS functionality but lacks swim tracking and cycling tracking. The device’s battery life lasts up to 3 days and is compatible with Android, iOS, Windows Phone, Mac, and Windows devices.
Comparison of features and performance
While there are similarities, the Amazfit GTS holds an advantage in terms of battery life, swim tracking, and cycling tracking. The Polar A370, however, has a broader range of device compatibility, making it a more versatile option.
User Interface and User Experience
Amazfit GTS
The Amazfit GTS features a touch-enabled display and offers various customization options for watch faces, as well as app support. Users can easily navigate through the menus and adjust settings as needed. The GTS also supports phone functionality, emails, and texting and has built-in music control capabilities.
Polar A370
The Polar A370 also has a touch-enabled display and supports phone functionality, emails, and texts. However, the watch does not have app support or music controls. Its user interface is simplistic and easy to understand, serving as a reliable fitness and activity monitor without the added complexity of extra features.
Comparison of user interface and user experience
The primary differences in user interface and experience lie in app support and music control capabilities. Users who prioritize these additional features will likely prefer the Amazfit GTS, while those seeking a more straightforward, fitness-focused device may lean towards the Polar A370.
Price and Value
Amazfit GTS
The Amazfit GTS is priced at $150, offering value to users through its long battery life, additional tracking features, and compatibility with a range of devices.
Polar A370
The Polar A370 is priced slightly higher at $179.95, providing users with a reliable and versatile fitness tracking experience and compatibility with an extensive range of devices.
Comparison of price and value
Considering the feature differences and price points, the Amazfit GTS offers a better value for money with a more extensive array of features and a longer battery life than the Polar A370. However, those who prioritize device compatibility or prefer a more fitness-dedicated smartwatch might find the Polar A370 to be a suitable choice.
Conclusion
Ultimately, the decision between the Amazfit GTS and Polar A370 will be determined by individual preferences and priorities. The Amazfit GTS offers a sleek design, longer battery life, and additional tracking features, making it an appealing choice for many users. On the other hand, the Polar A370 provides a more focused fitness tracking experience and superior compatibility with various devices. Careful consideration of one’s specific needs and desired features will lead to an informed and satisfying decision.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the main difference between the Amazfit GTS and Polar A370 in terms of design?
The Amazfit GTS has a larger and higher resolution AMOLED screen, while the Polar A370 features a stainless steel case for added durability.
Which device has a better battery life?
The Amazfit GTS outperforms the Polar A370 with a battery life of 14 days compared to 3 days.
Which smartwatch is more compatible with devices?
The Polar A370 is more versatile in terms of device compatibility, supporting Windows Phone, Mac, and Windows devices, along with Android and iOS.
Which watch offers more robust fitness tracking features?
The Amazfit GTS offers additional swim and cycling tracking features, while the Polar A370 provides a more straightforward fitness tracking experience.
Is the Amazfit GTS or Polar A370 better for music control and app support?
The Amazfit GTS offers built-in music control capabilities and app support, whereas the Polar A370 does not.
