Casio G-Shock GBA800 vs. Xiaomi Mi Band 3

G-Shock GBA800
Mi Band 3
 CasioG-Shock GBA800Buy NowXiaomiMi Band 3Buy Now

Basic Info

Suggested Price$120$44.95

Activity & Fitness

Cycling (Bicycling)


Duration2 years20 days


Windows Phone




Resolution128 x 80
Size0.78 inches


Audio Speaker


Barometer or Altimeter
Ultraviolet Sensor
Water Resistance20 ATM5 ATM




Operating System

Comparing Mi Band 3 and G-Shock GBA800

When it comes to choosing a smart wearable device, the Casio G-Shock GBA800 and Xiaomi Mi Band 3 are two popular choices worth considering. Picking the right watch is essential because it impacts your daily routine and can enhance your fitness tracking experience. Both Casio and Xiaomi have established themselves as reputable brands in the market, each having a rich history and unique value propositions.

This article aims to provide a comprehensive comparison of the Casio G-Shock GBA800 and the Xiaomi Mi Band 3. We will be discussing various aspects such as design and build, features and functionality, user interface and user experience, price and value, and frequently asked questions related to these two devices.

Design and Build

Casio G-Shock GBA800

The Casio G-Shock GBA800 boasts a rugged design, made to withstand harsh conditions. It features a resin case and strap, providing a sturdy and durable build. The watch has a digital screen, but specific resolution and screen size information are unavailable. The GBA800 is also quite lightweight, making it comfortable to wear during physical activities.

Xiaomi Mi Band 3

In contrast, the Xiaomi Mi Band 3 embraces a minimalist design, featuring a sleek silicone strap and compact form factor. The device is built with a 0.78-inch OLED display, boasting a resolution of 128 x 80 pixels. The Mi Band 3 is incredibly lightweight, perfect for all-day wear without any discomfort.

Comparison of design and build quality

While both devices offer durable builds, the key difference lies in their design approaches. The Casio G-Shock GBA800 presents a more rugged and heavy-duty appearance, while the Xiaomi Mi Band 3 showcases a sleek and minimalist style. Each design has its pros and cons, depending on personal preferences and intended use.

Features and Functionality

Casio G-Shock GBA800

The G-Shock GBA800 operates without a dedicated operating system but offers various fitness tracking features, such as calories tracking, sleep tracking, steps tracking, and more. The device lacks GPS, NFC, and cellular connectivity but does include Bluetooth for smartphone compatibility. The battery life of the GBA800 is incredibly long-lasting, clocking in at approximately two years.

Xiaomi Mi Band 3

Similarly, the Mi Band 3 does not feature a specific operating system but comes packed with fitness tracking capabilities, such as heart rate monitoring, sleep tracking, and distance tracking. The device is equipped with Bluetooth, but it also lacks GPS, NFC, and cellular connectivity. However, the Mi Band 3 has an impressive battery life of up to 20 days on a single charge.

Comparison of features and performance

The two devices share similar functionalities, but notable differences lie in the details of their tracking capabilities. The G-Shock GBA800 offers cycling tracking and an impressive battery life of two years, while the Mi Band 3 provides additional heart and distance tracking and a rechargeable battery with a 20-day lifespan. Each device has its unique set of advantages and disadvantages, depending on one’s needs and preferences.

User Interface and User Experience

Casio G-Shock GBA800

The user interface of the G-Shock GBA800 is relatively simple, relying on physical buttons for navigation. It is compatible with both Android and iOS devices, offering customization and app access through its Bluetooth connectivity. However, it lacks touch controls and a color display, which may be a downside for some users.

Xiaomi Mi Band 3

On the other hand, the Xiaomi Mi Band 3 features a touch-sensitive display, allowing for more intuitive navigation. It is also compatible with Android and iOS devices, providing a seamless integration with smartphone apps and customization options. The OLED screen, however, is not in color, which may be a drawback for those looking for a more vibrant interface.

Comparison of user interface and user experience

In terms of user interface and experience, the Xiaomi Mi Band 3 edges out the G-Shock GBA800 with its touch-sensitive controls and more straightforward navigation. Yet, both devices lack color displays and may not cater to users searching for visually rich interfaces. Moreover, both watches display compatibility with Android and iOS devices, making them versatile choices for smartphone users.

Price and Value

Casio G-Shock GBA800

The Casio G-Shock GBA800 is priced at $120, offering a rugged and robust design coupled with extensive fitness tracking features. The long-lasting battery life of two years also adds significant value to the device.

Xiaomi Mi Band 3

At $44.95, the Xiaomi Mi Band 3 is an affordable alternative with an impressive suite of features and sleek design. Its rechargeable 20-day battery life is also a strong selling point for potential buyers.

Comparison of price and value

Comparing the two devices, the Xiaomi Mi Band 3 offers more bang for the buck with its lower price tag and comparable features to the G-Shock GBA800. However, the G-Shock GBA800 might appeal to users in need of a more rugged build and longer battery life.


Ultimately, choosing between the Casio G-Shock GBA800 and Xiaomi Mi Band 3 depends on personal preferences, desired features, and budget. The G-Shock GBA800 caters to individuals seeking a rugged design and an extended battery life, while the Mi Band 3 proposes a more cost-effective solution with a sleek design and additional tracking capabilities.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which device is more durable: G-Shock GBA800 or Mi Band 3?

The G-Shock GBA800 is built with a more rugged and durable design intended to withstand harsh conditions, whereas the Mi Band 3 features a sleek and minimalist build. Both devices are water-resistant, with the GBA800 having a 20 ATM rating and the Mi Band 3 featuring a 5 ATM rating.

Is the battery life of the G-Shock GBA800 better than that of the Mi Band 3?

The G-Shock GBA800 has a considerably longer battery life of approximately two years, while the Xiaomi Mi Band 3 lasts up to 20 days on a single charge.

Which device is better for fitness tracking: G-Shock GBA800 or Mi Band 3?

Both devices offer a range of fitness tracking features, but the Mi Band 3 includes additional heart and distance monitoring. Deciding which is better ultimately depends on the individual’s specific fitness tracking needs and preferences.

Are both devices compatible with Android and iOS smartphones?

Yes, both the G-Shock GBA800 and Xiaomi Mi Band 3 are compatible with Android and iOS smartphones, allowing for seamless app integration and customization.

What is the primary difference between the G-Shock GBA800 and Mi Band 3?

The main differences between the two devices include design, battery life, and price. The G-Shock GBA800 offers a more rugged design with a longer battery life, while the Xiaomi Mi Band 3 is a more affordable option with a sleek and minimalist design.

All Wearables