Comparing Versa 2 and A360
Finding the perfect smartwatch or fitness tracker is crucial to enhance your exercise routine and monitor your daily activities effectively. The Fitbit Versa 2 and Polar A360 are two popular fitness trackers that offer exceptional tracking capabilities with their unique features.
Fitbit, a well-known brand in the wearables industry, has gained popularity for its fitness trackers that cater to varying customer needs. Founded in 2007 in San Francisco, the brand is known for its high-quality products and innovative technologies. Similarly, Polar is a brand that specializes in creating heart rate monitors and other fitness tracking devices. Established in 1977 in Finland, Polar has a reputation for pioneering sports training technology with its trusted products.
In this article, we will delve into a detailed comparison between the Fitbit Versa 2 and Polar A360 to help you make an informed decision about which smartwatch is the best fit for your individual needs.
Design and Build
Fitbit Versa 2
The Fitbit Versa 2 is made of an aluminum casing with a Gorilla Glass 3 screen. It has a 1.34-inch AMOLED touch display featuring a resolution of 300x300px. The lightweight design and comfortable straps make it convenient for daily wear and use during workouts.
Polar A360
Polar A360 has a sleek design containing a durable silicone strap and a rectangular 1.18-inch color touchscreen display, with a screen resolution of 160x80px. The watch has a waterproof rating of WR30, making it suitable for casual water activities, excluding swimming.
Comparison of design and build quality
Both smartwatches offer lightweight and comfortable designs, with the Fitbit Versa 2 being slightly larger due to its 1.34-inch display. The Versa 2 has a more premium feel with its aluminum casing and higher screen resolution, while the Polar A360 has a durable yet straightforward design. One of the notable differences is that Versa 2 is water-resistant up to 5 ATM, which allows for swim tracking, whereas the A360 has a WR30 rating with no swim tracking capabilities.
Features and Functionality
Fitbit Versa 2
Fitbit Versa 2 is equipped with a built-in operating system that supports various functionalities, such as heart rate monitoring, sleep tracking, steps counting, calories burning, and multiple sports modes. The watch offers a battery life of up to 5 days and is compatible with both Android and iOS smartphones. It also has built-in Bluetooth, NFC, and Wi-Fi capabilities, allowing users to access a variety of apps, music, and notifications.
Polar A360
The Polar A360 offers numerous fitness tracking capabilities, including heart rate monitoring, sleep tracking, steps counting, calories burning, and distance measurement. Although it lacks built-in GPS, it supports smartphone-based GPS tracking. It has an impressive battery life of up to 12 days and is compatible with Android, iOS, Mac, and Windows devices. The A360 also includes Bluetooth connectivity, allowing users to receive smartphone notifications and sync data with compatible devices.
Comparison of features and performance
Both fitness trackers offer a wide range of functionalities, including heart rate monitoring, sleep tracking, and daily activity measurements. While the Fitbit Versa 2 boasts additional features such as built-in NFC and Wi-Fi, Android and iOS compatibility, and smartphone-based GPS, the A360 stands out for its remarkable battery life and compatibility with Mac and Windows devices. The main differences between the two devices lie in the absence of cycling and oxygen tracking in the A360, as well as the lack of swim tracking due to its WR30 rating.
User Interface and User Experience
Fitbit Versa 2
Famed for its easy-to-navigate user interface, the Fitbit Versa 2 offers customizable watch faces, an organized app library, and voice control features, allowing for seamless interaction with the device. The smartwatch is also compatible with both Android and iOS devices, permitting users to receive notifications and interact with smartphone-based apps.
Polar A360
Similarly, the Polar A360 provides an intuitive user interface with swipe-based navigation, enabling users to access various features without difficulty. Although it does not support app installation, users can still receive basic notifications from their smartphone. Its compatibility with Android, iOS, Mac, and Windows allows for a flexible user experience.
Comparison of user interface and user experience
Both devices feature user-friendly interfaces, offering easy access to their respective features. However, the Fitbit Versa 2'', with its app support and voice control functionality, offers a more sophisticated user experience when compared to the straightforward Polar A360. Despite the A360's lack of customization options, it compensates by offering compatibility with various platforms.
Price and Value
Fitbit Versa 2
At a price of $199, the Fitbit Versa 2 offers enhanced features such as voice control, built-in NFC and Wi-Fi, and a superior build quality, providing users with value for money.
Polar A360
With a slightly higher price of $200, the Polar A360 delivers a robust fitness tracker with exceptional battery life and compatibility with multiple platforms but lacks certain advanced features found in the Versa 2.
Comparison of price and value
Although the price difference between the two devices is minimal, the Fitbit Versa 2 justifies its price with its premium build, enhanced features, and app support, providing users with a well-rounded smartwatch experience. The Polar A360, while offering reliable fitness tracking options and compatibility with multiple devices, lacks additional features such as voice control, NFC, and Wi-Fi connectivity, which may affect its overall value compared to its competitor.
Conclusion
Ultimately, the decision between the Fitbit Versa 2 and Polar A360 depends on personal preferences and specific requirements. If you prioritize a premium build, advanced features, and a more sophisticated user experience, the Fitbit Versa 2 is likely the better option for you. However, if long battery life, compatibility with multiple platforms, and a straightforward approach to fitness tracking are more important, then the Polar A360 may be the right choice.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which device is better for swimming?
The Fitbit Versa 2 is better suited for swimming, as it is water-resistant up to 5 ATM and offers swim tracking features. The Polar A360 has a WR30 rating, which is not suitable for swimming.
Which smartwatch has a better battery life?
The Polar A360 has a significantly longer battery life of up to 12 days, while the Fitbit Versa 2 offers up to 5 days of battery life.
Can I sync these devices with my computer?
The Polar A360 is compatible with both Mac and Windows computers. The Fitbit Versa 2, however, does not offer Mac or Windows compatibility.
Do both devices support smartphone notifications?
Yes, both the Fitbit Versa 2 and Polar A360 support smartphone notifications, with the Versa 2 offering a more comprehensive notifications experience.
Can I control music playback on these devices?
The Fitbit Versa 2 offers music controls and playback features, while the Polar A360 lacks these functionalities.
