Garmin Chronos vs. Garmin Vivosport

 
Chronos
Vivosport
 GarminChronosBuy NowGarminVivosportBuy Now

Basic Info

Suggested Price$1500$199
Release20182017

Activity & Fitness

Calories
Cycling (Bicycling)
Distance
Heart
Oxygen
Sleep
Steps
Swim

Battery

Duration8 days7 days
Rechargeable

Compatibility

Android
iOS
Windows Phone
Mac
Windows

Connectivity

Bluetooth
Cellular
GPS
NFC
Wi-Fi

Display

Color
Resolution218 x 21872 x 144
Size1.2 inchesNA
Touch
TypeMIPMIP

Functions

Audio Speaker
Clock
Phone
Vibration
Voice

Hardware

Accelerometer
Barometer or Altimeter
Ultraviolet Sensor
Water Resistance10 ATM5 ATM

Notifications

Phone
Emails
Texts

Software

Operating SystemWear OS
Apps
Music

Comparing Vivosport and Chronos

Garmin is a renowned brand with a solid reputation for producing high-quality GPS navigation and wearable technology devices. In this comparison, two popular fitness wearables from Garmin are put head-to-head: the Garmin Chronos and the Garmin Vivosport. As with any investment, it’s essential to choose the right device that matches one’s fitness needs and lifestyle.

Garmin has a long history of producing reliable and feature-packed devices that cater to various fitness enthusiasts, from casual gym-goers to professional athletes. Both the Chronos and Vivosport have their own unique features, benefits, and drawbacks. This article aims to provide readers with comprehensive information on the design, features, user interface, price, and value of these two remarkable devices, ultimately helping them make an informed decision on which one to choose.

Design and Build

Garmin Chronos

The Garmin Chronos, released in 2018, boasts a premium design and build, with materials such as:

  • Forged steel case
  • Sapphire crystal lens
  • Leather or titanium band options
  • 1.2-inch MIP color display (218 x 218 resolution)
  • 10 ATM water resistance

With this elegant design and sturdy construction, the Chronos is not only a fitness tracker but also a sophisticated timepiece built for everyday wear.

Garmin Vivosport

The Garmin Vivosport, on the other hand, was released in 2017 and is designed as a more affordable, lightweight wearable. Its design features include:

  • Flexible silicone bands
  • Slim, comfortable fit
  • MIP color display (72 x 144 resolution)
  • 5 ATM water resistance

While the Vivosport might not have the same premium build as the Chronos, it offers a comfortable, no-nonsense design for those who prioritize function over aesthetics.

Comparison of design and build quality

The major differences between the Chronos and Vivosport lie in their materials, design, and water resistance. The Chronos caters to those who appreciate a blend of elegance and functionality, whereas the Vivosport is tailored toward fitness enthusiasts who prefer a lightweight, functional wearable. Despite these differences, both devices offer excellent durability and are designed to withstand the rigors of everyday wear and exercise.

Features and Functionality

Garmin Chronos

The Garmin Chronos offers a wide array of features and functionalities that cater to various fitness enthusiasts. Some of these include:

  • Wear OS operating system
  • Accelerometer, barometer, and GPS
  • 8 days of battery life
  • Music control and audio speaker
  • Calendar, weather, and smart notifications
  • Phone, email, and text function
  • Extensive fitness tracking capabilities

Garmin Vivosport

Though more affordably priced, the Vivosport doesn’t skimp on features, offering a range of functionalities, such as:

  • Accelerometer, barometer, and GPS
  • 7 days of battery life
  • Music control
  • Calendar and smart notifications
  • Phone, email, and text function
  • Comprehensive fitness tracking capabilities

Comparison of features and performance

While both devices offer an array of tracking capabilities, the Chronos' Wear OS operating system provides access to additional apps and customization options. In terms of battery life, the Chronos slightly edges out the Vivosport with a one-day difference. Fitness-tracking-wise, both devices perform exceptionally well in accurately recording exercise data and providing useful health insights.

User Interface and User Experience

Garmin Chronos

The Chronos offers a user-friendly interface with its 1.2-inch MIP color touchscreen display. Along with phone compatibility, users can navigate through apps, customize watch faces, and utilize smartphone features with ease. The operating system grants access to third-party apps, further enhancing the device’s overall usability.

Garmin Vivosport

Although the Vivosport lacks an official operating system, it still delivers a smooth user experience through its MIP color touchscreen display. Apps, customization, and compatibility might be limited compared to the Chronos, but the Vivosport provides a streamlined, functional interface focused on fitness tracking and essential smart features.

Comparison of user interface and user experience

The key difference between the Chronos and Vivosport in this category is the operating system, with the Chronos using Wear OS and the Vivosport lacking an official OS. The Chronos offers a richer user experience with additional customization options and app availability, while the Vivosport offers a more minimalistic, fitness-focused experience. Both devices, however, ensure compatibility with Android and iOS smartphones for smooth integration and function.

Price and Value

Garmin Chronos

With a $1,500 price tag, the Garmin Chronos is considered a luxury fitness wearable, offering a balance between top-notch performance and sophisticated design. Its price may be steep for some users, but the extensive features and premium build are some factors that justify the investment for those wanting a high-quality fitness tracker and timepiece.

Garmin Vivosport

Priced at $199, the Vivosport offers an affordable alternative to the Chronos while still providing a wealth of features and solid performance. The value for money is evident, especially for those who prioritize fitness tracking over aesthetics and additional smart features.

Comparison of price and value

Ultimately, the choice between the Chronos and Vivosport boils down to personal preferences and budget constraints. If luxury design, premium materials, and extra features are top considerations, the Chronos is more suitable. However, if a more affordable, minimalist, and functional fitness tracker is desired, the Vivosport screams value for money.

Conclusion

In the Garmin Chronos vs Garmin Vivosport comparison, the choice ultimately depends on individual preferences and requirements. Both devices offer top-notch fitness tracking capabilities and smart features, but their design and price points cater to different audiences. Whether opting for the luxurious aesthetics and additional features of the Chronos or the affordable, functional design of the Vivosport, either choice equates to a reliable, high-quality Garmin fitness wearable.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the key difference between the Garmin Chronos and Garmin Vivosport?

The key difference lies in their design, build quality, and price. The Chronos sports a premium aesthetic and build, while the Vivosport has a lightweight, more affordable design.

Are both the Garmin Chronos and Garmin Vivosport waterproof?

Yes, both wearables are water-resistant. The Chronos has a 10 ATM water resistance rating, and the Vivosport has a 5 ATM rating.

Which device has better battery life, Garmin Chronos or Garmin Vivosport?

The Garmin Chronos has a slightly longer battery life of 8 days, compared to the 7-day battery life of the Vivosport.

Can I control music with both the Garmin Chronos and Garmin Vivosport?

Yes, both devices allow for music control. The Chronos also includes a built-in audio speaker, while the Vivosport does not.

Do both the Chronos and Vivosport support third-party apps?

Only the Chronos, with its Wear OS operating system, supports third-party apps. The Vivosport, lacking an official operating system, has limited app compatibility.

All Wearables