Garmin Fenix 3 vs. Garmin Venu

 
Fenix 3
Venu
 GarminFenix 3Buy NowGarminVenuBuy Now

Basic Info

Suggested Price$500$299
Release20152019

Activity & Fitness

Calories
Cycling (Bicycling)
Distance
Heartn/a
Oxygen
Sleep
Steps
Swim

Battery

Duration50 hours to 6 weeks5 days
Rechargeable

Compatibility

Android
iOS
Windows Phonen/a
Macn/a
Windowsn/a

Connectivity

Bluetooth
Cellular
GPS
NFC
Wi-Fi

Display

Color
Resolution218 x 218390 x 390
Size1.2 inches1.2 inches
Touch
TypeChroma LEDAMOLED

Functions

Audio Speaker
Clock
Phone
Vibration
Voice

Hardware

Accelerometer
Barometer or Altimeter
Ultraviolet Sensor
Water Resistance10 ATM5 ATM

Notifications

Phone
Emails
Texts

Software

Operating Systemn/aWear OS
Apps
Music

Comparing Venu and Fenix 3

When exploring the world of smartwatches, two popular options are the Garmin Fenix 3 and the Garmin Venu. Both of these devices offer a range of features designed to assist users in their day-to-day activities and fitness tracking. Choosing the right watch to meet your needs is crucial, as each device offers various functionalities and design aspects.

Garmin is a brand with an excellent reputation within the smartwatch and fitness tracker industry. With a history of producing reliable, high-quality wearables, it is no surprise that many people are interested in comparing the Fenix 3 and the Venu. In this article, we will thoroughly examine the design and build quality, features and functionality, user interface and experience, price and value, and frequently asked questions about these two devices.

Design and Build

Garmin Fenix 3

The Garmin Fenix 3 boasts a robust design, featuring a stainless-steel bezel and a reinforced housing for added durability. The dimensions of this watch are 51 x 51 x 16 mm, and it weighs 82 grams. The device has a 1.2-inch Chroma LED display with a resolution of 218 x 218 pixels. Although not a touchscreen, the Fenix 3 has five buttons for navigation and control.

Garmin Venu

On the other hand, the Garmin Venu has a sleeker design with a fiber-reinforced polymer casing. Measuring 43.2 x 43.2 x 12.4 mm and weighing 46.3 grams, the Venu is significantly lighter than the Fenix 3. This watch also has a 1.2-inch display, but it uses an AMOLED screen with a much higher resolution of 390 x 390 pixels, providing vivid colors and sharper images. The Venu is a touchscreen device that also includes two side buttons for added control.

Comparison of Design and Build Quality

When comparing the designs of the Fenix 3 and Venu, users will notice several differences. The Fenix 3 is heavier and more rugged, with a stainless-steel bezel and a Chroma LED display. In contrast, the Venu is lighter, with a sleeker design, fiber-reinforced casing, and an AMOLED touchscreen. While both devices are well-built, the choice between the two will depend on user preferences for visual appeal and functionality.

Features and Functionality

Garmin Fenix 3

The Garmin Fenix 3 operates on an unspecified proprietary software and offers users a myriad of features, including GPS, Bluetooth, and Wi-Fi connectivity. The watch has an impressive battery life, lasting between 50 hours and 6 weeks, depending on usage. Fitness tracking capabilities include calories, distance, sleep, steps, swimming, and cycling, but the Fenix 3 lacks heart rate monitoring and oxygen tracking. Users can also expect basic smartwatch functions like phone connectivity, emails, and text notifications.

Garmin Venu

Running on Wear OS, the Garmin Venu has a multitude of features, such as GPS, Bluetooth, and Wi-Fi connectivity. The device has a shorter battery life than the Fenix 3, lasting up to 5 days on a single charge. However, the Venu provides more comprehensive fitness tracking options like heart rate and oxygen monitoring, in addition to calories, distance, sleep, steps, swimming, and cycling. Standard smartwatch features are also present, including phone calls, emails, text notifications, and music support.

Comparison of Features and Performance

While both the Fenix 3 and Venu are feature-rich smartwatches, there are several differences to consider. The Fenix 3 boasts a longer battery life, but lacks heart rate and oxygen tracking features found in the Venu. Conversely, the Venu offers a more comprehensive fitness tracking experience but has a shorter battery life. Users must weigh the importance of battery life against additional tracking capabilities when comparing the two devices.

User Interface and User Experience

Garmin Fenix 3

The Fenix 3 offers a straightforward user experience, thanks to its Chroma LED display and five-button navigation. Compatibility with Android and iOS smartphones enables users to receive notifications and control their device remotely. Customization options, such as various watch faces and apps, are available through the Garmin Connect app.

Garmin Venu

With the Venu’s AMOLED touchscreen, navigating through menus and features becomes an intuitive experience. The device is compatible with Android and iOS smartphones, offering notifications and remote control options. Garmin’s Connect app enables users to customize watch faces, access applications, and manage data.

Comparison of User Interface and User Experience

Comparing the user experience between the Fenix 3 and Venu, the primary difference lies in the interaction method: buttons for the Fenix 3 and touchscreen for the Venu. Both watches are compatible with Android and iOS smartphones, providing users with similar notification and customization options through the Garmin Connect app.

Price and Value

Garmin Fenix 3

With a price of $500, the Garmin Fenix 3 offers users an array of features and a rugged build. The Fenix 3's battery life and durability are key selling points that contribute to its overall value.

Garmin Venu

At a lower price of $299, the Garmin Venu provides users with additional fitness tracking capabilities and a sleeker design. While the battery life is shorter, the Venu’s touchscreen and comprehensive tracking options deliver excellent value for the price.

Comparison of Price and Value

While the Fenix 3 is more expensive, it offers exceptional battery life and a durable build, which can justify the price difference for some users. The Garmin Venu, with its lower price point and more comprehensive fitness tracking capabilities, may be a better fit for those seeking a balance of performance and affordability.

Conclusion

Ultimately, the choice between the Garmin Fenix 3 and Garmin Venu will depend on personal preferences and priorities. The Fenix 3 is more rugged, with a longer battery life, while the Venu has a sleeker design and more detailed fitness tracking options. Consider the strengths of each device and your specific needs when making your decision.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which device has a better battery life?

The Garmin Fenix 3 has a significantly longer battery life, ranging from 50 hours to 6 weeks, whereas the Garmin Venu’s battery lasts up to 5 days.

Are both devices water-resistant?

Yes, the Garmin Fenix 3 and Venu are both water-resistant. The Fenix 3 has a water resistance rating of 10 ATM, while the Venu has a rating of 5 ATM.

Do both watches have heart rate monitoring?

No, only the Garmin Venu includes heart rate monitoring capabilities. The Garmin Fenix 3 does not have this feature.

Can I make phone calls with either device?

Both the Garmin Fenix 3 and Venu offer phone call functionality when paired with a compatible smartphone. However, neither device has built-in cellular capabilities.

Which watch is more suitable for outdoor activities?

The Garmin Fenix 3 is better suited for outdoor activities due to its rugged design, longer battery life, and superior water resistance. However, the Garmin Venu can still be used for many outdoor activities, thanks to its comprehensive fitness tracking features and water resistance rating.

All Wearables