Garmin Fenix 3 vs. Garmin Vivoactive 3

 
Fenix 3
Vivoactive 3
 GarminFenix 3Buy NowGarminVivoactive 3Buy Now

Basic Info

Suggested Price$500$299
Release20152017

Activity & Fitness

Calories
Cycling (Bicycling)
Distance
Heartn/a
Oxygen
Sleep
Steps
Swim

Battery

Duration50 hours to 6 weeks7 days
Rechargeable

Compatibility

Android
iOS
Windows Phonen/a
Macn/a
Windowsn/a

Connectivity

Bluetooth
Cellular
GPS
NFC
Wi-Fi

Display

Color
Resolution218 x 218240 x 240
Size1.2 inches1.2 inches
Touch
TypeChroma LEDMIP

Functions

Audio Speaker
Clock
Phone
Vibration
Voice

Hardware

Accelerometer
Barometer or Altimeter
Ultraviolet Sensor
Water Resistance10 ATM5 ATM

Notifications

Phone
Emails
Texts

Software

Operating Systemn/a
Apps
Music

Comparing Vivoactive 3 and Fenix 3

Choosing between the Garmin Fenix 3 and the Garmin Vivoactive 3 may seem like a daunting task, as both watches offer a robust selection of features and functions designed to suit any lifestyle. Whether you’re focused on fitness tracking or daily time management, both watches promise to deliver top-notch performance.

Deciding on the right smartwatch is essential to ensuring your needs are met, and understanding the reputation and history of the brand’s manufacturing your device can go a long way in building confidence in your purchase. Garmin is a brand renowned for its durable smartwatches, excellent fitness tracking features, and reliable performance. With a solid history in the industry, Garmin continues to push the boundaries of what smartwatches can do.

This article will guide you through an in-depth comparison of both the Fenix 3 and Vivoactive 3, delving into their design, features, interface, and more, ultimately helping you make an informed decision on which smartwatch is right for you.

Design and Build

Garmin Fenix 3

The Garmin Fenix 3 boasts a rugged design, offering a durable construction made of stainless steel and protected by a sapphire crystal display. Weighing in at 82 grams, the Fenix 3 is slightly heavier than its Vivoactive 3 counterpart, but not enough to cause discomfort. The watch’s screen resolution measures 218 x 218 pixels, providing a crisp and clear display through a 1.2-inch Chroma LED screen.

Garmin Vivoactive 3

Constructed from a combination of fiberglass-reinforced polymer, stainless steel, and a Corning Gorilla Glass 3 display, the Vivoactive 3 is just as sturdy as the Fenix 3. It’s also a bit lighter in design, providing a more comfortable fit at a mere 43 grams. With a slightly better screen resolution of 240 x 240 pixels, the Vivoactive 3 still features a 1.2-inch display, but uses MIP technology for improved readability outdoors, and has a touchscreen for easy navigation.

Comparison of design and build quality

Both the Fenix 3 and Vivoactive 3 are well-built and durable, with the former offering more heft and prominence due to its stainless steel construction. However, the Vivoactive 3 provides a slightly improved screen resolution and uses touchscreen technology, making it potentially more user-friendly. The choice ultimately depends on your preference for weight and screen interaction.

Features and Functionality

Garmin Fenix 3

While the Garmin Fenix 3's operating system is not explicitly mentioned, its compatibility with iOS and Android devices ensures a wide range of connectivity. Equipped with various sensors, including an accelerometer and a barometer, the Fenix 3 excels in its fitness tracking capabilities, like distance, cycling, steps, and sleep tracking. The watch has a battery life of up to 50 hours in GPS mode, or up to six weeks when used as a watch.

Garmin Vivoactive 3

Compatible with both Android and iOS devices, the Vivoactive 3 also features a wide array of sensors, including a heart rate monitor, which the Fenix 3 does not have. The Vivoactive shares many of the Fenix 3's fitness tracking capabilities but has a slightly shorter battery life of up to seven days, depending on usage.

Comparison of features and performance

While both the Fenix 3 and Vivoactive 3 offer impressive fitness tracking capabilities and connectivity options, the Vivoactive 3 gains an edge due to its heart rate monitor. Nevertheless, the Fenix 3 boasts a significantly longer battery life, which may be more appealing to those who don’t want to recharge often.

User Interface and User Experience

Garmin Fenix 3

The user interface of the Fenix 3 centers around its Chroma LED display, with navigation based on physical buttons on the watch’s side. The Fenix 3 is compatible with a variety of apps and can be customized with watch faces and features. Its compatibility with smartphones allows for additional functions like phone calls, texts, and email notifications.

Garmin Vivoactive 3

Thanks to its touchscreen MIP display, navigation on the Vivoactive 3 is more intuitive and interactive. The watch also supports apps, customization, and compatibility with smartphones but does not have a vibration function or voice activation capabilities.

Comparison of user interface and user experience

The main difference between the Fenix 3 and Vivoactive 3's interfaces is the latter’s touchscreen, which might be preferable for users accustomed to using smartphones. However, the Fenix 3 still offers excellent functionality through its physical buttons, with those who prefer a tactile experience in mind.

Price and Value

Garmin Fenix 3

With an estimated price of around $500, the Fenix 3 offers durability, long battery life, and a wide range of features that provide excellent value for the price.

Garmin Vivoactive 3

Priced at around $299, the Vivoactive 3 may appeal to buyers looking for a more affordable option without sacrificing quality or features, making it a solid contender in the smartwatch market.

Comparison of price and value

While the Fenix 3 and Vivoactive 3 each offer unique features that cater to different preferences, the Vivoactive 3 presents a slightly more budget-friendly choice without sacrificing the quality Garmin is known for. If cost is a significant factor, the Vivoactive 3 may be the ideal choice for you.

Conclusion

Considering the features, design, and functionality of the Garmin Fenix 3 and the Garmin Vivoactive 3, the ultimate decision comes down to personal preference. If you prioritize a more rugged design, extended battery life, and aren’t in need of a heart rate monitor, the Fenix 3 might be the right choice. However, those seeking a lighter, touchscreen-enabled device with additional biometric tracking abilities may find the slightly more affordable Vivoactive 3 a better fit for their needs. Regardless of your choice, either watch will provide a seamless and user-friendly experience, showcasing Garmin’s commitment to high-quality wearables.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is the Garmin Fenix 3 waterproof?

Yes, the Garmin Fenix 3 boasts a water resistance rating of 10 ATM, making it suitable for swimming and other water-based activities.

Can the Garmin Vivoactive 3 track heart rate?

Yes, the Garmin Vivoactive 3 features a built-in heart rate monitor, allowing users to track their heart rates during exercises or daily activities.

What are the battery lifes for Fenix 3 and Vivoactive 3?

The Fenix 3 has a battery life of up to 50 hours in GPS mode or six weeks when used as a watch. The Vivoactive 3 has a battery life of up to seven days, depending on usage.

What kind of fitness tracking features do both watches offer?

Both the Fenix 3 and the Vivoactive 3 offer a wide array of fitness tracking features, including step, sleep, distance, cycling, and swim tracking. The Vivoactive 3 also has a heart rate monitor, which the Fenix 3 lacks.

Are both watches compatible with smartphones?

Yes, both the Garmin Fenix 3 and the Garmin Vivoactive 3 can connect with Android and iOS smartphones, allowing users to receive notifications, make phone calls, and send texts through the watches.

All Wearables