Polar A370 vs. Garmin Venu

 PolarA370Buy NowGarminVenuBuy Now

Basic Info

Suggested Price$179.95$299

Activity & Fitness

Cycling (Bicycling)


DurationUp to 3 days5 days


Windows Phone




Resolution160 x 80390 x 390
Size1.18 inches1.2 inches


Audio Speaker


Barometer or Altimeter
Ultraviolet Sensor
Water ResistanceWR305 ATM




Operating SystemWear OS

Comparing Venu and A370

The Garmin Venu and Polar A370 fitness trackers are two popular options in the market of wearables. Garmin and Polar, both well-known brands in smartwatches and fitness trackers, have a history ofcreating reliable, feature-rich devices. Selecting the right wearable is crucial for those seeking to improve their health or achieve specific fitness goals. Each device comes with its uniqueattributes, advantages, and disadvantages. In this article, we will delve into a detailed comparison between the Garmin Venu and the Polar A370 to help you make an informed decision.

Selecting the right wearable is crucial for those seeking to improve their health or achieve specific fitness goals. Each device comes with its unique attributes, advantages, and disadvantages. Inthis article, we will delve into a detailed comparison between the Garmin Venu and the Polar A370 to help you make an informed decision.

Design and Build

Garmin Venu

The Garmin Venu features an impressive AMOLED display, with a screen resolution of 390 x 390 pixels, and a 1.2-inch screen size. The wearable’s overall design is sleek and modern, making itsuitable for various activities and occasions. Its water resistance rating is 5 ATM, ensuring that it can withstand water submersion or usage during swimming exercises.

Polar A370

The Polar A370 has a TFT LCD color display and a screen resolution of 160 x 80 pixels. With a screen size of 1.18 inches, it offers a slightly compact build compared to the Garmin Venu. The A370is water-resistant up to WR30, which means that it can withstand splashes and short immersions in water.

Comparison of design and build quality

When comparing the two devices, the Garmin Venu offers a more vibrant and sharper display, with a sleeker design. Both wearables have water-resistant capabilities, which guarantees durabilityduring exercise and outdoor activities. Each device has its own unique charm, but the Garmin Venu’s design gives it an advantage when discussing aesthetics and screen quality.

Features and Functionality

Garmin Venu

The Garmin Venu operates on Wear OS and offers various fitness tracking features, such as calories, distance, heart rate, oxygen levels, sleep, steps, and swim tracking. The device provides userswith a battery life of up to 5 days and Android and iOS compatibility. The Venu also offers Bluetooth, GPS, and Wi-Fi connectivity options.

Polar A370

The Polar A370 lacks a specific operating system but offers a wide range of fitness tracking options like calories, distance, heart rate, sleep, steps, and swim tracking. Its battery life can lastup to 3 days and is compatible with Android, iOS, Windows, and Mac systems. This wearable offers Bluetooth and GPS connectivity, albeit without Wi-Fi capabilities.

Comparison of features and performance

In terms of fitness tracking, both devices offer comprehensive options for monitoring various aspects of health, but the Garmin Venu has the edge because of oxygen level tracking. Moreover, theGarmin Venu provides a longer battery life and more connectivity options compared to the Polar A370. Overall, the Garmin Venu outperforms its competitor when considering its feature set andcompatibility options.

User Interface and User Experience

Garmin Venu

The Garmin Venu boasts a smooth user interface, evident through its touch-display navigation, customization options, and an array of compatible apps. The device works seamlessly with Android andiOS smartphones, offering phone, email, and text functions within the watch.

Polar A370

Even with a basic user interface, the Polar A370 provides touch-display navigation and compatibility with Android, iOS, Windows, and Mac devices. It also offers phone, email, and text functionsfor a complete user experience.

Comparison of user interface and user experience

Although both wearables offer touch-navigation and essential smartphone compatibility features, the Garmin Venu has access to various apps and customization options because of the Wear OSplatform. This gives the Garmin Venu an advantage in terms of user experience and interface.

Price and Value

Garmin Venu

With a retail price of $299, the Garmin Venu offers premium features in design, performance, and user interface aspects. Its functionality meets the expectations of its price point, providingexcellent value for money.

Polar A370

At $179.95, the Polar A370's features are impressive, although incomparable with those of the Garmin Venu. Nevertheless, it still provides a useful set of built-in fitness tracking options, makingit a good value for its price.

Comparison of price and value

Even though the Garmin Venu costs more than the Polar A370, its enhanced features justify the extra investment for those seeking advanced functionalities. If you have a lower budget but are stillkeen on tracking basic fitness activities, the Polar A370 offers good value for money.


In conclusion, the Garmin Venu holds a clear advantage in design, functionality, user experience, and overall value over its competitor, the Polar A370. The Venu provides its users with anextensive range of features, better performance, and a more polished design. The Polar A370 is a suitable alternative for those with budget constraints but still eager to track essential health andfitness parameters. Your choice between these two devices will depend on your personal requirements, preferences, and budget constraints.

Frequently Asked Questions

1. How do I choose between the Garmin Venu and Polar A370?

Consider your specific requirements, preferences, and budget to make an informed decision between the two devices. The Garmin Venu is more advanced in terms of features, design, and userexperience, while the Polar A370 offers basic functions at a more affordable price.

2. Is the Garmin Venu worth the additional cost?

If you’re seeking advanced features, stellar design, and a seamless user interface, the Garmin Venu is worth the additional cost. Its extensive functionality justifies the higher price. However,if your focus is on basic fitness tracking and a lower price point, the Polar A370 is a viable alternative.

3. Are both devices compatible with Android and iOS smartphones?

Yes, the Garmin Venu and the Polar A370 are compatible with both Android and iOS smartphones. The Garmin Venu operates on Wear OS, while the Polar A370 does not have a specific operating systembut still offers compatibility options.

4. How do the battery lives of the Garmin Venu and Polar A370 compare?

The Garmin Venu has a battery life of up to 5 days, while the Polar A370 can last up to 3 days on a single charge. Both devices come with rechargeable batteries.

5. Can I use these wearables for swimming?

Both the Garmin Venu and the Polar A370 are water-resistant and capable of tracking swimming activities. The Garmin Venu has a 5 ATM water resistance rating, while the Polar A370 has a WR30rating.

All Wearables