Garmin Vivoactive HR vs. Garmin Vivoactive 3

 
Vivoactive HR
Vivoactive 3
 GarminVivoactive HRBuy NowGarminVivoactive 3Buy Now

Basic Info

Suggested Price$250$299
Release20162017

Activity & Fitness

Calories
Cycling (Bicycling)
Distance
Heart
Oxygen
Sleep
Steps
Swim

Battery

Duration13 hours to 8 days7 days
Rechargeable

Compatibility

Android
iOS
Windows Phone
Macn/a
Windowsn/a

Connectivity

Bluetooth
Cellular
GPS
NFC
Wi-Fi

Display

Color
Resolution148 x 205240 x 240
Size1.38 inches1.2 inches
Touch
Typen/aMIP

Functions

Audio Speaker
Clock
Phone
Vibration
Voice

Hardware

Accelerometer
Barometer or Altimeter
Ultraviolet Sensor
Water Resistance5 ATM5 ATM

Notifications

Phone
Emails
Texts

Software

Operating Systemn/a
Apps
Music

Comparing Vivoactive 3 and Vivoactive HR

When looking for the perfect fitness tracker, it’s essential to consider factors such as brand reputation, overall design, build quality, features, and value for money. Garmin, one of the leading brands in GPS technology and wearables, offers two popular options: the Garmin Vivoactive 3 and Garmin Vivoactive HR. Understanding the various aspects of these devices can help in selecting the right fitness companion for your unique needs and preferences.

Finding the appropriate smartwatch or fitness tracker is crucial in enhancing your exercise routine and monitoring your overall health. Garmin, a brand founded in 1989, has earned a solid reputation for its innovation, durability, and advances in wearables—making it a top choice for fitness enthusiasts.

In this informative piece, we will analyze the design and build, features and functionality, user interface and experience, as well as price and value for both the Garmin Vivoactive 3 and Garmin Vivoactive HR. Our aim is to provide a comprehensive comparison of these two devices, allowing you to choose the best wearable tailored to your needs.

Design and Build

Garmin Vivoactive 3

The Garmin Vivoactive 3 boasts a sleek design, with a stainless steel bezel and a 1.2-inch color display. Weighing 43 grams, it offers a comfortable fit for everyday use. With a 240 x 240 screen resolution, the Vivoactive 3 delivers a clear and vibrant display for easy readability during workouts.

Garmin Vivoactive HR

On the other hand, the Garmin Vivoactive HR features a more rectangular design with a 1.38-inch screen. Slightly heavier at 48 grams, this device also provides a reliable build quality, featuring a durable rubber strap. Its screen resolution of 148 x 205 ensures that you get an unobstructed view, both indoors and outdoors.

Comparison of design and build quality

While both devices have their unique charm, the Vivoactive 3 presents a more refined and modern design with its circular face and stainless steel bezel. On the contrary, the Vivoactive HR’s rectangular face is less sleek, and its rubber strap may not be suitable for formal occasions. In terms of display quality, the higher screen resolution on the Vivoactive 3 provides a more vivid output.

Features and Functionality

Garmin Vivoactive 3

The Vivoactive 3 is equipped with an array of features to improve your fitness routine. It runs on Garmin’s proprietary operating system and is powered by a battery that lasts up to 7 days. The device provides accurate fitness tracking, including steps, distance, calories, and heart rate. In addition, it boasts swim tracking, GPS capabilities, and Garmin Pay support for contactless payments.

Garmin Vivoactive HR

Similarly to its counterpart, the Vivoactive HR also offers an impressive range of features such as heart rate, steps, calories, and sleep tracking. The device provides exceptional battery life, ranging from 13 hours (with GPS) to 8 days. It is compatible with Windows Phone and can track outdoor activities like cycling and swimming. However, the Vivoactive HR lacks the Garmin Pay feature.

Comparison of features and performance

Both devices share many similarities in terms of features, such as fitness tracking, GPS capabilities, and water resistance. However, the Vivoactive 3 stands out with its Garmin Pay support and compatibility with both Android and iOS devices. In contrast, the Vivoactive HR has an edge when it comes to battery life and Windows Phone compatibility.

User Interface and User Experience

Garmin Vivoactive 3

Garmin’s Vivoactive 3 offers intuitive navigation via its responsive touchscreen interface. The display allows for easy customization and quick access to essential apps like weather, notifications, and activity tracking. The device is compatible with Android and iOS, ensuring seamless connectivity with your smartphone.

Garmin Vivoactive HR

Similarly, the Vivoactive HR also provides a user-friendly experience with its touchscreen display, allowing for easy navigation and customization. It also offers compatibility with Android, iOS, and Windows Phone, making it a versatile choice for various users.

Comparison of user interface and user experience

Both the Vivoactive 3 and Vivoactive HR deliver a smooth user interface with their touchscreens, granting convenient access to apps and features. While both devices are compatible with Android and iOS, the Vivoactive HR stands out with its Windows Phone compatibility. However, the Vivoactive 3's more robust display and Garmin Pay support improve the overall user experience.

Price and Value

Garmin Vivoactive 3

Priced at $299, the Garmin Vivoactive 3 offers an attractive combination of features, design, and performance, providing excellent value for money to fitness enthusiasts.

Garmin Vivoactive HR

At $250, the Garmin Vivoactive HR presents a more affordable option with a strong set of functionalities and longer battery life.

Comparison of price and value

Regarding value for money, both the Vivoactive 3 and Vivoactive HR cater to different needs and preferences. If you’re looking for a sleeker design, better display, and Garmin Pay support, the Vivoactive 3 might be the better choice. However, if you prioritize longer battery life and Windows Phone compatibility, the Vivoactive HR offers excellent value at a lower price point.

Conclusion

Both the Garmin Vivoactive 3 and Vivoactive HR cater to different requirements and preferences in terms of design, features, and price. In conclusion, the Vivoactive 3 provides a more sophisticated design, better display, and the added advantage of Garmin Pay. On the other hand, the Vivoactive HR offers exceptional battery life, more compatibility options, and a lower price point. Ultimately, it boils down to your personal preference and the factors you consider most important in a fitness tracker or smartwatch.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which device has better battery life: the Garmin Vivoactive 3 or Vivoactive HR?

The Garmin Vivoactive HR offers longer battery life than the Vivoactive 3, ranging from 13 hours with GPS to 8 days without GPS usage.

Do both the Vivoactive 3 and Vivoactive HR support swim tracking?

Yes, both devices are waterproof with a 5 ATM rating and support swim tracking.

Are both devices compatible with Android and iOS smartphones?

Yes, both the Garmin Vivoactive 3 and Vivoactive HR are compatible with Android and iOS smartphones, but only the Vivoactive HR supports Windows Phone.

Is Garmin Pay available on both the Vivoactive 3 and Vivoactive HR?

Garmin Pay is only available on the Vivoactive 3 and not on the Vivoactive HR.

Which device offers a better display: the Garmin Vivoactive 3 or Vivoactive HR?

The Garmin Vivoactive 3 has a superior display with a 240 x 240 screen resolution, while the Vivoactive HR has a 148 x 205 resolution screen.

All Wearables