Comparing Loop and A370
The Polar A370 and Polar Loop are two fitness trackers from the renowned brand, Polar. These devices are designed to help users track and monitor various aspects of their daily life, including fitness, sleep, and general activities. Both models offer unique features, some specific advantages, and cater to a variety of consumer needs.
Choosing the right fitness watch is important, as it determines how well the watch can cater to an individual’s specific requirements. Whether it’s counting steps, monitoring sleep patterns or keeping track of heart rate, each watch has its strengths and weaknesses.
Polar is a well-established brand in the world of fitness wearables, known for its quality products and innovative technology. With decades of experience in the industry, Polar has built a strong reputation and strives to stay at the forefront of advancements in wearable technology.
In this article, an in-depth comparison between the Polar A370 and Polar Loop will be presented, covering each product’s design, build, features, functionality, user interface, user experience, price, and value. This comprehensive analysis will help potential buyers make informed decisions based on their individual needs and preferences.
Design and Build
Polar A370
The Polar A370 features a sleek, modern design with a silicone strap and a stainless-steel buckle. Its dimensions are 40 x 23 x 10 mm, and it weighs approximately 35 grams. The A370 sports a 1.18-inch TFT LCD color touchscreen display with a resolution of 160 x 80 pixels.
Polar Loop
On the other hand, the Polar Loop is a compact fitness tracker with a sturdy stainless steel clasp and a TPU (Thermoplastic Polyurethane) strap. It measures 20 x 10 x 2 mm and weighs about 38 grams. The Loop utilizes an LED display without a touchscreen interface, relying on a single button for navigation instead.
Comparison of design and build quality
Both the A370 and Loop share similarities in their build quality, featuring durable materials and water resistance. However, significant differences exist between their displays, with the A370 sporting a larger and more detailed color touchscreen, whereas the Loop uses a more basic LED display. This results in the A370 having greater visual appeal and ease of use, while the Loop offers a simpler, more straightforward design.
Features and Functionality
Polar A370
Key features of the Polar A370 include:
- Operating system: Proprietary Polar OS
- Sensors: Accelerometer, Heart Rate Sensor
- Battery life: Up to 3 days
- Fitness tracking: Calories, Distance, Heart Rate, Sleep, Steps, Swimming
- Compatibility: Android, iOS, Windows
- Connectivity: Bluetooth
Polar Loop
Major features of the Polar Loop include:
- Sensors: Accelerometer
- Battery life: 5 days
- Fitness tracking: Calories, Distance, Sleep, Steps
- Compatibility: Android, iOS
- Connectivity: Bluetooth
Comparison of features and performance
When comparing the features and performance of both devices, the A370 stands out with an extensive range of fitness tracking options, including heart rate and swim monitoring. Additionally, it boasts a more robust operating system, which allows for phone functionality, text messages, and email notifications, unlike the simpler Polar Loop. However, the Loop offers a longer battery life of five days compared to the A370's three-day battery life.
User Interface and User Experience
Polar A370
The A370 has an intuitive touchscreen interface, making navigation through menus and apps simple and efficient. The proprietary Polar OS ensures a smooth user experience, and the device is compatible with Android, iOS, and Windows phones for syncing data and receiving notifications.
Polar Loop
Conversely, the Polar Loop uses a simple LED display and a single button for navigation, providing a more basic user experience. Compatibility is limited to Android and iOS devices for data syncing and connectivity.
Comparison of user interface and user experience
Based on the user interface and experience, the A370 offers greater versatility and ease of use. The touchscreen interface on the A370 provides a more seamless navigation experience, while the Polar Loop may require more time to adapt to its single-button operation. Overall, the A370's compatibility with multiple operating systems and its more extensive feature set enhances the user experience considerably compared to the Polar Loop.
Price and Value
Polar A370
With a price of $179.95, the A370 may seem a little steep for those on a budget. However, its extensive range of features, excellent build quality, and an advanced, user-friendly interface offer considerable value for the investment.
Polar Loop
On the other hand, priced at $100, the Polar Loop is a more affordable option for those seeking a simple yet dependable fitness tracking solution. Despite its basic interface and limited features, the Loop offers excellent value for money as a reliable and easy-to-use tracker.
Comparison of price and value
When comparing the price and value of both devices, the A370 may justify its higher cost due to its superior features, functionality, and user experience. However, the Polar Loop is a good choice for those seeking a budget-friendly option with a focus on essential fitness tracking capabilities.
Conclusion
After considering both the Polar A370 and Polar Loop, it’s clear that they cater to different consumer needs. The A370 appeals to those who desire advanced features, a color touchscreen, and versatile compatibility options, while the Polar Loop offers a more cost-effective, streamlined approach to fitness tracking. Ultimately, the choice between these two devices depends on personal preferences and individual requirements. It’s important to weigh the pros and cons of each before making a decision on the most suitable fitness tracker for your lifestyle.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which device has better water resistance?
The Polar A370 offers WR30 water resistance, while the Polar Loop has a 2 ATM rating. They both provide a similar level of water protection, being suitable for activities such as showering and recreational swimming, but not for high-intensity water sports or diving.
Which device has a better battery life?
The Polar Loop boasts a longer battery life of up to 5 days, compared to the A370's 3-day battery life. This makes the Loop a more suitable option for those prioritizing extended battery life.
Can I use either device for cycling or tracking oxygen levels?
Neither the Polar A370 nor the Polar Loop offer cycling or oxygen tracking features. They focus mainly on fitness tracking such as step counting, calorie counting, and sleep monitoring.
Are both devices compatible with multiple operating systems?
The Polar A370 is compatible with Android, iOS, and Windows, whereas the Polar Loop is compatible with Android and iOS only.
Is the Polar A370 worth the higher price?
The value of the Polar A370 depends on individual preferences and needs. If advanced features, a color touchscreen, and compatibility with multiple operating systems are important, the A370 may be worth the higher price. However, for those seeking a more basic, budget-friendly option, the Polar Loop remains an excellent choice.
