Comparing A370 and M600
When exploring the world of fitness wearables, a common decision many face is whether to choose the Polar A370 or the Polar M600. This comprehensive comparison will help consumers make an informed decision on which device best fits their needs. In this article, we’ll discuss the importance of selecting the right watch, the reputations and history of the brands involved, and an in-depth look at the features and functionalities of each product.
Finding the right wearable is crucial because it should integrate seamlessly into the user’s lifestyle and fitness goals. Both the Polar A370 and the Polar M600 are designed to offer fitness tracking, heart rate monitoring, and smartphone compatibility. Polar, the brand behind these two models, is a reputable and established company with years of experience in the wearables market.
Design and Build
Polar A370
The Polar A370 features a modern design built with the following materials and specifications:
- Size: 1.18 inches screen size
- Weight: Lightweight and comfortable for daily wear
- Display/Screen: 160 x 80 TFT LCD color display with touch functionality
- Water Resistance: WR30 rating
Polar M600
Similarly, the Polar M600 has an attractive, sporty design with these materials and specifications:
- Size: 1.3 inches screen size
- Weight: Slightly heavier than the A370, but still comfortable for everyday use
- Display/Screen: 240 x 240 TFT color display
- Water Resistance: IPX8 rating, suitable for swimming
Comparison of design and build quality
The primary differences between the Polar A370 and Polar M600 lie in their size, weight, and water resistance ratings. Although the M600 is slightly larger and heavier, it offers better water resistance, making it ideal for swimmers. Both models have a color display, but the M600 has a higher resolution screen for improved visibility.
Features and Functionality
Polar A370
The Polar A370 is packed with features that cater to various fitness tracking needs:
- Operating System: Proprietary Polar software
- Sensors: Accelerometer and heart rate monitor
- Battery Life: Up to 3 days
- Fitness Tracking: Calories, distance, heart rate, sleep, steps, swimming
Polar M600
The Polar M600 improves on several aspects of the A370 and offers additional features:
- Operating System: Android Wear
- Sensors: Accelerometer and heart rate monitor
- Battery Life: 2 days
- Fitness Tracking: Calories, distance, heart rate, sleep, steps, cycling (bicycling)
Comparison of features and performance
The most significant difference in features between the two models is the operating system - the Polar M600 utilizes the Android Wear platform, while the A370 uses proprietary Polar software. Additionally, the M600 has a slightly shorter battery life (2 days) compared to the A370 (3 days). The M600 offers cycling tracking, while the A370 covers swimming tracking, highlighting their unique capabilities catering to different workout preferences.
User Interface and User Experience
Polar A370
The Polar A370 offers a user-friendly interface and experience:
- Display: 160 x 80 TFT LCD color display with touch functionality
- Navigation: Simple and intuitive touch-based navigation
- Apps and Customization: Limited through Polar software
- Compatibility: Android, iOS, Mac, Windows, and Windows Phone
Polar M600
The Polar M600 also provides an enjoyable user experience:
- Display: 240 x 240 TFT color display
- Navigation: Touch-based navigation and customizable watch faces
- Apps and Customization: Android Wear platform offers a wide range of apps
- Compatibility: Android, iOS, Mac, and Windows
Comparison of user interface and user experience
Both the Polar A370 and Polar M600 offer similar user experiences, with the M600 featuring a slightly larger and higher resolution screen. The key difference is the operating system, with the M600 being more customizable and versatile due to its Android Wear platform. The A370 offers compatibility with Windows Phones, which the M600 does not.
Price and Value
Polar A370
At a price of $179.95, the Polar A370 offers excellent value for its features and design.
Polar M600
The Polar M600 is priced at $330, reflecting its higher-end design and additional functionality offered by the Android Wear platform.
Comparison of price and value
Ultimately, the decision between the Polar A370 and Polar M600 comes down to personal preference and budget. The A370 is a more affordable option, while the M600 packs additional functionalities, making it worth the extra investment for those seeking enhanced features.
Conclusion
In summary, both the Polar A370 and the Polar M600 have unique features catering to different preferences and budgets. The A370 is an excellent choice for those seeking affordability and basic fitness tracking capabilities. The M600, on the other hand, offers more versatile features and improved user experience thanks to its Android Wear operating system. Make an informed decision based on their respective advantages and limitations to find the perfect wearable suited to individual needs.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the Polar A370 suitable for swimmers?
Yes, the Polar A370 is water-resistant (WR30 rating) and offers swim tracking functionality.
Does the Polar M600 support third-party apps?
The Polar M600 is built on the Android Wear platform, enabling support for a wide range of third-party apps.
Can I use the Polar A370 with my Windows Phone?
Yes, the Polar A370 is compatible with Windows Phone devices.
What is the battery life of the Polar M600?
The Polar M600 has a battery life of up to 2 days on a single charge.
Which device offers a larger screen, the Polar A370 or the Polar M600?
The Polar M600 features a larger screen at 1.3 inches compared to the A370's 1.18-inch display.
