Casio G-Shock GBA800 vs. Amazfit T-Rex

 
G-Shock GBA800
T-Rex
 CasioG-Shock GBA800Buy NowAmazfitT-RexBuy Now

Basic Info

Suggested Price$120$140
Release20182019

Activity & Fitness

Calories
Cycling (Bicycling)
Distance
Heart
Oxygen
Sleep
Steps
Swim

Battery

Duration2 years20 days
Rechargeable

Compatibility

Android
iOS
Windows Phone
Mac
Windows

Connectivity

Bluetooth
Cellular
GPS
NFC
Wi-Fi

Display

Color
Resolution360 x 360
Size1.3 inches
Touch
TypeAMOLED

Functions

Audio Speaker
Clock
Phone
Vibration
Voice

Hardware

Accelerometer
Barometer or Altimeter
Ultraviolet Sensor
Water Resistance20 ATM5 ATM

Notifications

Phone
Emails
Texts

Software

Operating SystemBuild-in
Apps
Music

Comparing T-Rex and G-Shock GBA800

The Amazfit T-Rex and Casio G-Shock GBA800 are both popular options for those seeking a durable, reliable smartwatch. Each offers a unique set of features, making it crucial for potential buyers to compare and contrast the two products to determine the best fit for their needs.

Selecting the right smartwatch is important, especially considering the impact it can have on daily life, from fitness tracking to smartphone compatibility. Both Amazfit and Casio have strong reputations, with Amazfit being known for its stylish yet functional approach, and Casio offering a long-standing legacy in durable, reliable watches.

Throughout this article, we will delve deeper into each device, evaluating their design and build, features and functionality, user interface and user experience, price and value, and frequently asked questions to deliver a comprehensive comparison, helping you make an informed decision.

Design and Build

Amazfit T-Rex

Amazfit T-Rex is designed with durability in mind, boasting a rugged exterior made from a combination of polycarbonate and stainless steel. It offers a 1.3-inch AMOLED color display with a 360 x 360 screen resolution and touch capabilities. The watch is lightweight and comes with 5 ATM water resistance, making it suitable for various outdoor activities.

Casio G-Shock GBA800

The Casio G-Shock GBA800 features a robust build, incorporating a mix of resin and stainless steel. While it lacks a color display and touch functionality, the watch offers a classic digital watch face, providing all essential information in a clear format. With a 20 ATM water resistance rating, the GBA800 is designed for even the most extreme environments.

Comparison of design and build quality

Both watches showcase a rugged and durable design. The Amazfit T-Rex offers a more modern aesthetic with its color touch display, while the Casio G-Shock GBA800 sticks to a classic, sporty look. The GBA800 provides superior water resistance, making it suitable for more intense water-based activities compared to the T-Rex.

Features and Functionality

Amazfit T-Rex

The T-Rex runs on a built-in operating system and comes equipped with an array of sensors, including an accelerometer and barometer. It offers fitness tracking for calories, distance, heart rate, sleep, steps, cycling, and swimming. The watch also features a 20-day battery life and is both Android and iOS compatible, with Bluetooth for wireless syncing.

Casio G-Shock GBA800

The G-Shock GBA800 lacks a dedicated operating system but still offers an accelerometer for fitness tracking purposes. It can monitor calories, cycling, sleep, steps, and swimming but does not offer heart rate or distance tracking. With an impressive 2-year battery life (non-rechargeable), the GBA800 is compatible with both Android and iOS devices via Bluetooth connectivity.

Comparison of features and performance

The Amazfit T-Rex delivers more fitness tracking features, including heart rate and distance monitoring. The G-Shock GBA800, however, offers a much longer battery life, making it better suited for those with minimal charging opportunities. Both watches provide the essential fitness tracking functions and are compatible with popular smartphone options.

User Interface and User Experience

Amazfit T-Rex

T-Rex offers a clear and responsive touch display, allowing for easy navigation and access to apps and settings. It supports phone, email, and text notifications, and provides a customizable experience with a range of supported apps. The watch is compatible with both Android and iOS devices, delivering a seamless experience for users of either platform.

Casio G-Shock GBA800

The GBA800, while lacking touch functionality and app support, provides a straightforward user interface through its digital watch display. Notifications for both Android and iOS devices are limited to vibration alerts. However, the G-Shock smartphone app allows for some customization and synchronization with its compatible fitness tracking features.

Comparison of user interface and user experience

The Amazfit T-Rex offers a richer user experience with its touch screen, app support, and extensive notification capabilities. The Casio G-Shock GBA800 provides a more basic user experience, focusing on simplicity and core features but still offering some customization through its companion app.

Price and Value

Amazfit T-Rex

At $140, the Amazfit T-Rex delivers a good blend of functionality and design, offering numerous fitness tracking options and a modern user interface. Its sleek appearance and feature set provide excellent value for the price.

Casio G-Shock GBA800

Priced at $120, the Casio G-Shock GBA800 is an affordable option for those seeking a durable smartwatch with basic fitness tracking capabilities. Its long battery life and classic design make it an appealing option for the budget-conscious shopper.

Comparison of price and value

Both watches offer solid value for their respective price points. The Amazfit T-Rex comes with additional features and a more modern user interface, while the Casio G-Shock GBA800 is a reliable, no-nonsense choice for those prioritizing durability and long battery life.

Conclusion

The Amazfit T-Rex and Casio G-Shock GBA800 cater to different preferences and requirements. The T-Rex can be recommended to those who prioritize a modern user experience, complete with a touch screen and additional fitness tracking features. Meanwhile, the G-Shock GBA800 is ideal for users seeking a classic, durable smartwatch focused on longevity and essential fitness tracking functions.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which watch has a longer battery life?

The Casio G-Shock GBA800 has a longer battery life, lasting for up to 2 years, while the Amazfit T-Rex has a battery life of up to 20 days.

Which watch is better for water-based activities?

The Casio G-Shock GBA800 is better suited for water-based activities, with a 20 ATM water resistance rating, compared to the 5 ATM rating of the Amazfit T-Rex.

Are both watches compatible with Android and iOS devices?

Yes, both the Amazfit T-Rex and Casio G-Shock GBA800 are compatible with Android and iOS devices via Bluetooth connectivity.

Which watch has a color display and touch functionality?

The Amazfit T-Rex features a color touch display, while the Casio G-Shock GBA800 has a classic digital watch display without touch capabilities.

Do both watches offer heart rate monitoring?

Only the Amazfit T-Rex offers heart rate monitoring, while the Casio G-Shock GBA800 does not include this feature.

All Wearables