Michael Kors Access Bradshaw vs. Fitbit Ionic vs. New Balance RunIQ vs. Asus VivoWatch vs. Samsung Galaxy Watch
 | | | | | |
| Michael KorsAccess BradshawRemove Buy Now | FitbitIonicRemove Buy Now | New BalanceRunIQRemove Buy Now | AsusVivoWatchRemove Buy Now | SamsungGalaxy WatchRemove Buy Now |
Basic Info | |||||
| Suggested Price | $350 | $299 | $299 | $160 | $330 |
| Release | 2016 | 2017 | 2017 | 2018 | 2018 |
Activity & Fitness | |||||
| Calories | n/a | ||||
| Cycling (Bicycling) | n/a | ||||
| Distance | n/a | ||||
| Heart | n/a | ||||
| Oxygen | n/a | ||||
| Sleep | n/a | ||||
| Steps | n/a | ||||
| Swim | n/a | ||||
Battery | |||||
| Duration | n/a | 4+ days | 24 hours (5 hrs w GPS and heart rate) | 24 hours to 10 days | 7 days |
| Rechargeable | n/a | ||||
Compatibility | |||||
| Android | |||||
| iOS | |||||
| Windows Phone | n/a | NA | |||
| Mac | n/a | NA | |||
| Windows | n/a | NA | |||
Connectivity | |||||
| Bluetooth | |||||
| Cellular | n/a | NA | |||
| GPS | n/a | ||||
| NFC | n/a | ||||
| Wi-Fi | |||||
Display | |||||
| Color | |||||
| Resolution | 320 x 290 | 348x250 | 400 x 400 | 128 x 128 | 360 x 360 |
| Size | n/a | 1.42 | 1.39 inches | NA | 1.2 inches or 1.3 inches |
| Touch | n/a | ||||
| Type | n/a | OLED | AMOLED | NA | AMOLED |
Functions | |||||
| Audio Speaker | n/a | ||||
| Clock | |||||
| Phone | n/a | ||||
| Vibration | n/a | ||||
| Voice | n/a | ||||
Hardware | |||||
| Accelerometer | n/a | ||||
| Barometer or Altimeter | n/a | NA | |||
| Ultraviolet Sensor | n/a | ||||
| Water Resistance | 1 ATM | 50m | 5 ATM | IP67 | 5 ATM |
Notifications | |||||
| Phone | n/a | ||||
| Emails | n/a | ||||
| Texts | n/a | ||||
Software | |||||
| Operating System | n/a | Fitbit OS | Android Wear 1.5 | KoodOS | Tizen OS |
| Apps | n/a | ||||
| Music | n/a | Spotify | |||