Michael Kors Access Bradshaw vs. Fitbit Zip vs. New Balance RunIQ vs. Fitbit Charge vs. Xiaomi Mi Band
 | | | | | |
| Michael KorsAccess BradshawRemove Buy Now | FitbitZipRemove Buy Now | New BalanceRunIQRemove Buy Now | FitbitChargeRemove Buy Now | XiaomiMi BandRemove Buy Now |
Basic Info | |||||
| Suggested Price | $350 | $60 | $299 | $130 | $15 |
| Release | 2016 | 2012 | 2017 | 2014 | 2015 |
Activity & Fitness | |||||
| Calories | n/a | ||||
| Cycling (Bicycling) | n/a | ||||
| Distance | n/a | ||||
| Heart | n/a | ||||
| Oxygen | n/a | ||||
| Sleep | n/a | ||||
| Steps | n/a | ||||
| Swim | n/a | ||||
Battery | |||||
| Duration | n/a | 6 months | 24 hours (5 hrs w GPS and heart rate) | 7-10 days | 30 days |
| Rechargeable | n/a | ||||
Compatibility | |||||
| Android | |||||
| iOS | |||||
| Windows Phone | n/a | n/a | NA | ||
| Mac | n/a | NA | |||
| Windows | n/a | NA | |||
Connectivity | |||||
| Bluetooth | |||||
| Cellular | n/a | ||||
| GPS | n/a | ||||
| NFC | n/a | ||||
| Wi-Fi | |||||
Display | |||||
| Color | NA | ||||
| Resolution | 320 x 290 | n/a | 400 x 400 | NA | NA |
| Size | n/a | n/a | 1.39 inches | NA | NA |
| Touch | n/a | NA | NA | ||
| Type | n/a | n/a | AMOLED | OLED | NA |
Functions | |||||
| Audio Speaker | n/a | ||||
| Clock | |||||
| Phone | n/a | ||||
| Vibration | n/a | ||||
| Voice | n/a | ||||
Hardware | |||||
| Accelerometer | n/a | ||||
| Barometer or Altimeter | n/a | ||||
| Ultraviolet Sensor | n/a | ||||
| Water Resistance | 1 ATM | Splash Resistant | 5 ATM | 1 ATM | IP67 |
Notifications | |||||
| Phone | n/a | ||||
| Emails | n/a | ||||
| Texts | n/a | ||||
Software | |||||
| Operating System | n/a | n/a | Android Wear 1.5 | NA | NA |
| Apps | n/a | ||||
| Music | n/a | ||||