Comparing Gear Fit and A370
The Polar A370 and Samsung Gear Fit are popular fitness trackers that have caught the attention of many consumers. Both brands have a long history of producing high-quality, innovative products. Polar, a Finnish company established in 1977, is known for developing the world’s first wireless heart rate monitor. Samsung, a South Korean conglomerate founded in 1938, has diversified its business to include wearable technology such as the Gear Fit. This article will provide a comprehensive comparison of the Polar A370 and Samsung Gear Fit, including their design, features, user experience, price, and value.
Choosing the right wearable device is crucial, as it can enhance one’s fitness journey, track progress and promote a healthier lifestyle. Comparing the Polar A370 and Samsung Gear Fit will help in making an informed decision based on technical specifications, design elements, and features tailored to each individual’s needs.
Design and Build
Polar A370
Materials: Silicone,
Size: 3.8 x 2.3 x 1.4 inches (9.6 x 5.8 x 3.5 cm),
Weight: 31.7g,
Display: 160 x 80 resolution, 1.18-inch TFT LCD touchscreen with color display.
Samsung Gear Fit
Materials: Plastic and aluminum,
Size: 2.3 x 0.92 x 0.47 inches (58.3 x 23.3 x 12 mm),
Weight: 27g,
Display: 432 x 128 resolution, 1.84-inch Super AMOLED touchscreen with color display.
Comparison of design and build quality
When comparing the Polar A370 and Samsung Gear Fit, there are some noticeable differences in their design and build. The A370 has a silicone band, while the Gear Fit is constructed of plastic and aluminum. The Gear Fit has a higher screen resolution and a larger display than the A370. The A370, however, is slightly heavier than the Gear Fit. Both devices feature color touchscreen displays, but the Gear Fit boasts a more vibrant Super AMOLED screen, while the A370 has a TFT LCD screen. Overall, the Gear Fit offers a more premium look and feel, whereas the A370 has a sportier design.
Features and Functionality
Polar A370
Operating system: N/A,
Sensors: Accelerometer, heart rate monitor,
Battery life: Up to 3 days,
Calories, distance, heart rate, sleep, steps, and swim tracking, GPS (via smartphone), Android, iOS, Mac, and Windows compatibility, Bluetooth connectivity, phone, email, and text functions.
Samsung Gear Fit
Operating system: N/A,
Sensors: Accelerometer, heart rate monitor,
Battery life: 2-3 days,
Calories, distance, heart rate, sleep, and steps tracking, Android compatibility, Bluetooth connectivity, IP67 water resistance, phone, email, and text functions.
Comparison of features and performance
Regarding features and functionality, there are several similarities between the Polar A370 and Samsung Gear Fit. Both trackers monitor calories, distance, heart rate, sleep and steps. However, the A370 can track swimming sessions and is compatible with more devices, including iOS, Mac, and Windows. The Gear Fit does not offer swim tracking or compatibility with iOS, Mac, and Windows.
User Interface and User Experience
Polar A370
Display: 1.18-inch TFT LCD,
Navigation: Touchscreen,
Apps and customization: N/A,
Compatibility: Android, iOS, Mac, and Windows compatibility.
Samsung Gear Fit
Display: 1.84-inch Super AMOLED,
Navigation: Touchscreen,
Apps and customization: N/A,
Compatibility: Android compatibility.
Comparison of user interface and user experience
In terms of user interface and user experience, both the Polar A370 and Samsung Gear Fit feature touchscreens for navigation. Although the A370's TFT LCD screen is smaller than the Gear Fit’s Super AMOLED screen, it is compatible with a wider range of devices. The Gear Fit, on the other hand, is only compatible with Android devices.
Price and Value
Polar A370
Cost: $179.95,
Value for money: Offers additional tracking features and wider compatibility.
Samsung Gear Fit
Cost: $150,
Value for money: Provides a more premium design and better screen quality.
Comparison of price and value
The Polar A370 is priced slightly higher than the Samsung Gear Fit at $179.95. It provides additional tracking features such as swim tracking and is compatible with more devices, making it a suitable choice for individuals with various tech preferences. The Gear Fit’s lower price of $150 still offers value in its premium design and screen quality but is limited in device compatibility and tracking options.
Conclusion
While both the Polar A370 and Samsung Gear Fit are popular fitness trackers, there are some key points to consider when deciding between the two devices. The A370 offers more tracking features, including swimming, and more extensive compatibility with different devices, while the Gear Fit features a more premium-looking design and higher screen quality. Ultimately, the choice between these two devices comes down to individual preferences, specific features or design elements, and price points.
Frequently Asked Questions
Do both the Polar A370 and Samsung Gear Fit have GPS capability?
The Polar A370 has GPS capability through a connected smartphone, while the Samsung Gear Fit does not have GPS functionality.
Which device is more water-resistant, the Polar A370 or Samsung Gear Fit?
The Polar A370 has a water resistance rating of WR30, while the Samsung Gear Fit has a water resistance rating of IP67, which offers protection in water up to one meter deep for 30 minutes.
What’s the difference in battery life between the Polar A370 and Samsung Gear Fit?
The battery life of the Polar A370 can last up to three days, while the Samsung Gear Fit’s battery life ranges between two to three days.
Can the Polar A370 and Samsung Gear Fit be used with an iPhone?
The Polar A370 is compatible with iOS devices, including the iPhone. However, the Samsung Gear Fit is not compatible with iOS devices.
Which device has a better screen, the Polar A370 or Samsung Gear Fit?
The Samsung Gear Fit has a superior screen with its 1.84-inch Super AMOLED display and a higher resolution of 432 x 128 compared to the Polar A370's 1.18-inch TFT LCD display and 160 x 80 resolution.
